SEO Performance Report
72.3
https://www.amazingknowledge.com/
Key Metrics
Overall Score
2.15s
Desktop LCP
6.2MB
Weight
229
Requests
11.4s
Mobile LCP
6.2MB
Weight
229
Requests
Visual Progress
0.9s
1.7s
2.6s
3.4s
4.3s
5.2s
6.0s
6.9s
TTFB
FCP
LCP
0.9s
1.7s
2.6s
3.5s
4.3s
5.2s
6.1s
6.9s
TTFB
FCP
LCP
Page Composition
Page Weight
Total: 6.2 MB
Images
4.4 MB
JavaScript
1 MB
Fonts
373.3 KB
CSS Stylesheets
275.7 KB
HTML
40.8 KB
Other
6.9 KB
Media
0B
Request Count
Total: 111 requests
JavaScript
49 req
CSS Stylesheets
37 req
Images
14 req
Fonts
6 req
Other
4 req
HTML
1 req
Media
0 req
Performance Metrics
First Contentful Paint
Needs Work2.99s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted onto your page.
Mobile:
3.9 s
Desktop:
0.8 s
Score:
49%
Learn More →
Speed Index
At Risk8.15s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated.
Mobile:
10.1 s
Desktop:
3.5 s
Score:
15%
Learn More →
Total Blocking Time
Good159ms
How much time is blocked by scripts during your page loading process.
Mobile:
120 ms
Desktop:
260 ms
Score:
96%
Learn More →
Largest Contentful Paint
At Risk8.62s
Largest Contentful Paint marks how long it takes for the largest element of content to be painted on your page.
Mobile: 11.4 s
Desktop: 2.1 s
Score:
30%
Learn More →
Cumulative Layout Shift
Excellent0.006
Cumulative Layout Shift measures the movement of visible elements within the viewport as the page loads.
Mobile: 0
Desktop: 0.02
Score:
100%
Learn More →
Response Codes
Total Requests
119
Success Rate
100%
Error Rate
0%
200
119
Summary
65.1%
Core
63.0%
Performance
81.8%
SEO
91.0%
Accessibility
86.0%
Best Practice
Page Title
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Title is the heading of the webpage. The sentence or string enclosed between html title tag (<title></title>) is the title of your website. Search engines searches for the title of your website and displays title along with your website address on search result. Title is the most important element for both SEO and social sharing. Title should be less than 50 to 60 characters because search engine typically displays this length of string or sentence on search result. A good title can consist the primary keyword, secondary keyword and brand name. For example a fictitious gaming information providing sites title may be like "the future of gaming information is here". A webpage title should contain a proper glimpse of the website. title is important element as an identification of your website for user experience, SEO and social sharing. So have a nice and catching title.
You have a page title and it is between 15 - 70 characters. Well done!
Length: 53
Meta Description
At Risk
Metric Score: 0%
Description is the full interpretation of your website content and features. Most often it is a short paragraph that describe what are features and information provided by the website to its visitors. You may consider it a advertising of your website. Although not important for search engine ranking but very important for hits or visits through search engine results. Description should be less than 150 character because search engine shows this length of paragraph on search result. And every page of website should contain an unique description to avoid description duplication. Description is the definition of your website for user experience so form it as complete but short and precise illustration of your website.
Your site does not have a meta description.
Length: 0
Meta Keywords
At Risk
Metric Score: 0%
This is an informational metric and does not affect your overall score. Meta keywords are not used by Google for search ranking. However, some search engines (e.g. Bing) may still reference them as a spam signal, and they can serve as useful organizational metadata for your content strategy.
Your site does not have any meta keywords.
Length: 0
Metric Score: N/A
This optional informational metric compares legacy meta keywords with page content and does not affect the overall score. It is not a focus/target-keyword check. When no meta keywords are present, the result is Not configured / Not scored.
Not configured / Not scored — no legacy meta keywords were supplied for this page. This metric does not evaluate a focus or target keyword.
| Meta Keyword | In Content |
|---|
Text/HTML Ratio Test
At Risk
Measured Value: 5.1%
Metric Score: 51%
Text-to-HTML ratio measures visible text content as a percentage of total HTML markup. Modern CMS and framework-heavy sites (Joomla, WordPress, React, etc.) typically produce 5–15% due to component scaffolding, utility CSS classes, and inline SVGs. A ratio above 15% is excellent. While not a direct ranking factor, a low ratio signals DOM bloat, inline code, and excessive markup that affects Core Web Vitals, crawl efficiency, and overall page weight.
Your text-to-HTML ratio is 5.1% — below the ideal minimum of 15%. The page has significant markup overhead. Look for inline SVGs, excessive wrapper divs, inline scripts/styles, or unused module output.
HTML Headings
At Risk
Metric Score: 39%
H1 status is the existence of any content inside h1 tag. Although not important like Meta titles and descriptions for search engine ranking but still a good way to describe your contents in search engine result. H2 status is less important but should be used for proper understanding of your website for visitor.
Issues found: No H1 tags found. Add one H1 tag with relevant keywords., Duplicate headings found. Ensure all headings are unique.
H1(0)
H2(14)
- Welcome to AmazingKnowledge!
- Why Everybody Love Our Snacks
- Purchase Seven Snacks Online
- Diana Swift - Regular Customer
- John Brown - Regular Customer
- Tiffany Greenfield - Regular Customer
- How To Place An Order:
- Do You Have Any Questions?
- Special Offers and Deals
- Seven Corner
- Seven Cafe
- Seven Coffee Corner
- Seven Store
- Seven Cafe
H3(10)
- Premium Quality
- Ready to Use
- 100% Natural Ingridients
- Innovative
- Secret Ingridients
- Suitable for Animals
- 1. Select your products
- 2. Complete the checkout process
- 3. Download your products and enjoy!
- Send Us An Email
H4(6)
- Pineapple Chips1
- Lemon Chips1
- Strawberry Chips1
- Mango Chips1
- Apple Chips1
- Melon Chips1
H5(0)
H6(0)
Heading Order
Needs Work
Metric Score: 65%
Properly ordered headings that do not skip levels convey the semantic structure of the page, making it easier to navigate and understand when using assistive technologies.
Ensure heading elements are in a sequentially-descending order without skipping levels. Score: 75%. 1 heading order issue(s) found.
Heading Levels Used: h2, h3, h4
Level Skips: 1
Issues:
- Page starts with h2 instead of h1. The first heading should be h1.
Lighthouse Failing Elements (1):
| Element | Selector | Issue |
|---|---|---|
<h4 class="entry-title"> |
article.post > figure.woocom-project > figcaption.woocom-list-content > h4.entry-title | Fix any of the following: Heading order invalid |
Sitemap
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Sitemap is a xml file which contain full list of your website urls. It is used to include directories of your websites for crawling and indexing for search engine and access for users. It can help search engine robots for indexing your website more fast and deeply. It is roughly an opposite of robots.txt. You can create a sitemap.xml by various free and paid services or you can write it with proper formatting. Also keep these things in mind: 1) An uncompressed sitemap must be no larger than 50 MB (52,428,800 bytes) and can contain maximum 50,000 urls. If you have more urls than this, create multiple sitemap files and use a sitemap index file. 2) Put your sitemap in the website root directory and add the url of your sitemap in robots.txt. 3) sitemap.xml can be compressed using gzip for faster loading.
A valid XML sitemap was found.
Metric Score: 70%
Measures navigation, editorial relevance, source authority heuristics, duplication signals, and user-value diagnostics. No universal internal-to-external ratio is assumed; source quantity alone is informational, and rendered or visible claims remain indeterminate without browser evidence.
Needs Review — a specific content or citation pattern warrants editorial review; link quantity alone is not the defect. Source HTML: 40 internal and 14 external occurrences; 21 and 5 unique destinations.
Measurement scope: Source HTML is measured. Rendered DOM and visible DOM remain explicitly indeterminate unless separately collected.
| Mode | Status | Internal occurrences | External occurrences | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source HTML | measured | 40 | 14 | |
| Rendered DOM | indeterminate | — | — | No browser-rendered DOM was collected. |
| Visible DOM | indeterminate | — | — | Computed style, layout, and browser visibility were not measured. |
Unique destinations: 21 internal; 5 external.
Semantic regions
| header | internal_occurrences: 5; external_occurrences: 0 |
|---|---|
| navigation | internal_occurrences: 8; external_occurrences: 3 |
| main content | internal_occurrences: 0; external_occurrences: 0 |
| related content | internal_occurrences: 0; external_occurrences: 0 |
| sidebar | internal_occurrences: 27; external_occurrences: 11 |
| footer | internal_occurrences: 0; external_occurrences: 0 |
| source appendix | internal_occurrences: 0; external_occurrences: 0 |
| other | internal_occurrences: 0; external_occurrences: 0 |
External source categories (heuristic)
| commercial reference | 11 |
|---|---|
| unknown | 3 |
Findings
| Check | Status | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| internal navigation | pass | At least one unique internal destination is present in source HTML. |
| source appendix | pass | No unusually large source appendix was detected. |
| commercial outbound volume | needs_review | Commercially mixed outbound links require individual editorial review. |
| raw url anchor text | pass | Raw URL anchor text is not excessive. |
| source visible h1 | pass | Source HTML does not contain multiple non-hidden H1 elements. |
| repeated heading sequences | needs_review | 1 heading text/level combinations repeat in source HTML. |
| duplicate article body | indeterminate | Cross-page article-body duplication requires comparison with other retained page bodies. |
| orphaned page | indeterminate | Orphan status requires crawl-wide inbound-link evidence. |
| external response status | indeterminate | Destination status checks are not part of this source parser; use retained crawl/link-check evidence. |
| citation claim connection | indeterminate | Whether citations support nearby claims requires editorial review. |
Methodology
| internal hostname rule | Exact hostname after removing a leading www label; other subdomains are external. |
|---|---|
| www equivalent | yes |
| other subdomains internal | no |
| relative urls internal | yes |
| fragments excluded from occurrence counts | yes |
| fragments removed from unique destinations | yes |
| duplicate occurrences retained | yes |
| visibility rule | Rendered and visible counts are indeterminate; source_hidden is a markup-only diagnostic. |
| region rule | Closest semantic element/id/class/role classifies header, navigation, main, related, sidebar, footer, or source appendix. |
| threshold and formula | No universal internal/external ratio. Score fails only for no internal navigation; large appendix, commercial mix, raw URL anchors, multiple source H1s, or repeated headings need review; quantity alone is informational. |
Unique destination lists
Internal
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/catalog/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/my-account/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/knowledgebase/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/contact/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/cart/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/checkout/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/?print=print
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/pineapple-chips/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/lemon-chips/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/strawberry-chips/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/mango-chips/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/apple-chips/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/melon-chips/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/can-sci-fi-collecting-turn-profitable/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/sigmund-freud-dream-interpretation/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/should-you-ask-for-a-promotion/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/how-to-unleash-profit-in-your-online-business/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/terms-of-service/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/privacy-policy/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/refund-policy/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/instant-delivery/
External
- https://www.facebook.com/amazingknowledgepage
- https://x.com/nicknewton104
- https://www.tumblr.com/nicknewton
- https://the7.io/small-store/product/melon-chips/
- https://www.google.com/maps/place/ShopRite+of+Metro+Plaza,+Luis+Marin+Blvd+%26+6th+St,+Jersey+City,+NJ+07302/@40.726501,-74.037885,16z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x89c25753bb218bcd:0x452f3b3607f59c5
Parsed source links (54 occurrences)
| # | Scope | Region | Destination | Anchor | Category | Rel | Source hidden |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | internal | navigation | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/catalog/ | Catalog | internal | no | |
| 2 | internal | navigation | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/my-account/ | My Account | internal | no | |
| 3 | internal | navigation | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/knowledgebase/ | Knowledgebase | internal | no | |
| 4 | internal | navigation | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/contact/ | Contact Us | internal | no | |
| 5 | external | navigation | https://www.facebook.com/amazingknowledgepage | Facebook page opens in new window | commercial_reference | no | |
| 6 | external | navigation | https://x.com/nicknewton104 | X page opens in new window | commercial_reference | no | |
| 7 | external | navigation | https://www.tumblr.com/nicknewton | Tumblr page opens in new window | commercial_reference | no | |
| 8 | internal | header | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/cart/ | $0.000 | internal | no | |
| 9 | internal | header | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/cart/ | View Cart | internal | no | |
| 10 | internal | header | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/checkout/ | Checkout | internal | no | |
| 11 | internal | header | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/cart/ | View Cart | internal | no | |
| 12 | internal | header | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/checkout/ | Checkout | internal | no | |
| 13 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/?print=print | internal | no | ||
| 14 | external | sidebar | https://the7.io/small-store/product/melon-chips/ | BUYNOW | unknown | no | |
| 15 | external | sidebar | https://the7.io/small-store/product/melon-chips/ | BUYNOW | unknown | no | |
| 16 | external | sidebar | https://the7.io/small-store/product/melon-chips/ | BUYNOW | unknown | no | |
| 17 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/pineapple-chips/ | internal | no | ||
| 18 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/pineapple-chips/ | Pineapple Chips1 | internal | bookmark | no |
| 19 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/pineapple-chips/ | Select options | internal | nofollow | no |
| 20 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/lemon-chips/ | internal | no | ||
| 21 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/lemon-chips/ | Lemon Chips1 | internal | bookmark | no |
| 22 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/lemon-chips/ | Select options | internal | nofollow | no |
| 23 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/strawberry-chips/ | internal | no | ||
| 24 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/strawberry-chips/ | Strawberry Chips1 | internal | bookmark | no |
| 25 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/strawberry-chips/ | Select options | internal | nofollow | no |
| 26 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/mango-chips/ | internal | no | ||
| 27 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/mango-chips/ | Mango Chips1 | internal | bookmark | no |
| 28 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/mango-chips/ | Select options | internal | nofollow | no |
| 29 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/apple-chips/ | internal | no | ||
| 30 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/apple-chips/ | Apple Chips1 | internal | bookmark | no |
| 31 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/apple-chips/ | Select options | internal | nofollow | no |
| 32 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/melon-chips/ | internal | no | ||
| 33 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/melon-chips/ | Melon Chips1 | internal | bookmark | no |
| 34 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/melon-chips/ | Select options | internal | nofollow | no |
| 35 | external | sidebar | https://www.google.com/maps/place/ShopRite+of+Metro+Plaza,+Luis+Marin+Blvd+%26+6th+St,+Jersey+City,+NJ+07302/@40.726501,-74.037885,16z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x89c25753bb218bcd:0x452f3b3607f59c5 | VIEW MAP | commercial_reference | noopener | no |
| 36 | external | sidebar | https://www.google.com/maps/place/ShopRite+of+Metro+Plaza,+Luis+Marin+Blvd+%26+6th+St,+Jersey+City,+NJ+07302/@40.726501,-74.037885,16z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x89c25753bb218bcd:0x452f3b3607f59c5 | VIEW MAP | commercial_reference | noopener | no |
| 37 | external | sidebar | https://www.google.com/maps/place/ShopRite+of+Metro+Plaza,+Luis+Marin+Blvd+%26+6th+St,+Jersey+City,+NJ+07302/@40.726501,-74.037885,16z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x89c25753bb218bcd:0x452f3b3607f59c5 | VIEW MAP | commercial_reference | noopener | no |
| 38 | external | sidebar | https://www.google.com/maps/place/ShopRite+of+Metro+Plaza,+Luis+Marin+Blvd+%26+6th+St,+Jersey+City,+NJ+07302/@40.726501,-74.037885,16z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x89c25753bb218bcd:0x452f3b3607f59c5 | VIEW MAP | commercial_reference | noopener | no |
| 39 | external | sidebar | https://www.google.com/maps/place/ShopRite+of+Metro+Plaza,+Luis+Marin+Blvd+%26+6th+St,+Jersey+City,+NJ+07302/@40.726501,-74.037885,16z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x89c25753bb218bcd:0x452f3b3607f59c5 | VIEW MAP | commercial_reference | noopener | no |
| 40 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/can-sci-fi-collecting-turn-profitable/ | internal | no | ||
| 41 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/can-sci-fi-collecting-turn-profitable/ | Can Sci-Fi Collecting Turn Profitable? | internal | no | |
| 42 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/sigmund-freud-dream-interpretation/ | internal | no | ||
| 43 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/sigmund-freud-dream-interpretation/ | Sigmund Freud Dream Interpretation | internal | no | |
| 44 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/should-you-ask-for-a-promotion/ | internal | no | ||
| 45 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/should-you-ask-for-a-promotion/ | Should You Ask for a Promotion? | internal | no | |
| 46 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/how-to-unleash-profit-in-your-online-business/ | internal | no | ||
| 47 | internal | sidebar | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/how-to-unleash-profit-in-your-online-business/ | How to Unleash Profit in Your Online Business | internal | no | |
| 48 | external | sidebar | https://www.facebook.com/amazingknowledgepage | Facebook page opens in new window | commercial_reference | no | |
| 49 | external | sidebar | https://x.com/nicknewton104 | X page opens in new window | commercial_reference | no | |
| 50 | external | sidebar | https://www.tumblr.com/nicknewton | Tumblr page opens in new window | commercial_reference | no | |
| 51 | internal | navigation | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/terms-of-service/ | Terms & Conditons | internal | no | |
| 52 | internal | navigation | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/privacy-policy/ | Privacy Policy | internal | no | |
| 53 | internal | navigation | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/refund-policy/ | Refund Policy | internal | no | |
| 54 | internal | navigation | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/instant-delivery/ | Instant Delivery | internal | no |
Tested URL: https://www.amazingknowledge.com/ · Checked: 2026-10-21T02:27:10+00:00 · Detector: SEOFront Link Analysis 1.0 · Evidence schema: 1
NoIndex, NoFollow, DoFollow Links
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
NoIndex prevents search engines from indexing a page, while NoFollow prevents passing link equity. DoFollow links allow both. Minimize NoIndex and NoFollow unless intentional, and ensure DoFollow links dominate for SEO. Use meta robots tags carefully to control crawling behavior.
No NoIndex links found, which is good for SEO. Good balance of NoFollow and DoFollow links. No restrictive meta robots settings, allowing crawling. Links detected, supporting site navigation.
| Component | Your Value | Score |
|---|---|---|
| NoIndex Links (30 pts max) | 0 links | 30 / 30 |
| DoFollow vs NoFollow (30 pts max) | 48 DoFollow · 6 NoFollow | 30 / 30 |
| Meta Robots (20 pts max) | No restrictions | 20 / 20 |
| Link Presence (20 pts max) | 54 total links | 20 / 20 |
| Total | 100 / 100 | |
NoFollow Links (6):
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/pineapple-chips/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/lemon-chips/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/strawberry-chips/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/mango-chips/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/apple-chips/
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/product/melon-chips/
≥ 80 = Excellent • 60–79 = Warning • < 60 = Critical
SEO Friendly Links
At Risk
Metric Score: 50%
An SEO friendly link follows these rules: use dashes as separators, avoid parameters and numbers, and use static URLs. To optimize: 1) Replace underscores or other separators with dashes, remove numbers and parameters. 2) Merge www and non-www URLs. 3) Use static URLs and create an XML sitemap. 4) Block unfriendly links via robots.txt. 5) Use canonical tags.
Some links of your site are not SEO friendly. Review and optimize them.
Not SEO Friendly Links (1)
- https://www.amazingknowledge.com/?print=print
Favicon
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
A favicon is a small icon displayed in browser tabs and bookmarks, enhancing brand recognition and user experience. Ensure your site has a favicon for better SEO and professionalism.
A valid, decodable favicon was found.
Image Alt Test
At Risk
Metric Score: 25%
An alternate title for images (alt attribute) describes the image content, aiding search engine spiders and accessibility. Ensure all content images have descriptive alt text, excluding decorative images.
Your site has 23 images without alt text, which needs improvement.
Images Without Alt Text (23)
- Base64 Image (SVG)
- Base64 Image (SVG)
- Base64 Image (SVG)
- Base64 Image (SVG)
- Base64 Image (SVG)
- Base64 Image (SVG)
- Base64 Image (SVG)
- Base64 Image (SVG)
- Base64 Image (SVG)
- Base64 Image (SVG)
- Base64 Image (SVG)
- Base64 Image (SVG)
- Base64 Image (SVG)
- Base64 Image (SVG)
- Base64 Image (SVG)
- Base64 Image (SVG)
- Base64 Image (SVG)
- Base64 Image (SVG)
- Base64 Image (SVG)
- /wp-content/uploads/footer-art.jpg
Document has a valid `hreflang`
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Use hreflang tags to specify language and regional targeting for international pages.
Document has a valid `hreflang`
Links have descriptive text
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Use descriptive link text instead of generic phrases like "click here" or "learn more."
Links have descriptive text
Document has a valid `rel=canonical`
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Use canonical links to specify preferred URLs and avoid duplicate content issues.
Document has a valid `rel=canonical`
Page isn’t blocked from indexing
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Ensure pages are not blocked from crawling by robots.txt or meta robots tags.
Page isn’t blocked from indexing
Links are crawlable
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Ensure anchor elements have href attributes so search engines can discover linked pages.
Links are crawlable
Page has successful HTTP status code
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Pages should return a successful HTTP status code (200) to be indexed.
Page has successful HTTP status code
Metric Score: 0%
Lighthouse found 1 issue(s). Provide descriptive alt text for all content images to aid search engines and accessibility.
Image elements do not have `[alt]` attributes
<img style="margin: 8px 0px 15px 0px; max-width: 100%;" src="/wp-content/uploads/footer-art.jpg" width="356">
Structured data is valid
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Use structured data (Schema.org) to enhance search engine understanding and rich results.
Manual verification required
robots.txt is valid
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Ensure a valid robots.txt file exists to guide search engine crawlers.
Not applicable (pass)
Document has a `<title>` element
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Provide a descriptive <title> element to improve search visibility and click-through rates.
Document has a `<title>` element
Metric Score: 0%
Include a concise meta description to improve click-through rates in search results.
Document does not have a meta description
DOC Type
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
A doctype declaration validates your web page and ensures proper rendering. It is not a direct SEO factor but is essential for web standards compliance. Add a doctype (e.g., <!DOCTYPE html>) to your HTML.
The final HTML response has a valid HTML5 doctype with only harmless leading bytes.
<!DOCTYPE html>Deprecated HTML Tag
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Deprecated HTML tags and attributes (e.g., <font>, <center>) are outdated and may not be supported in future browsers. Replace them with modern HTML and CSS for better compatibility and maintainability.
Your site does not have any deprecated HTML tags.
HTML Page Size
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
HTML page size impacts webpage loading time and should generally stay under 100 KB (excluding external CSS, JS, or images). To optimize: 1) Move CSS and JS to external files. 2) Prioritize text content for faster rendering. 3) Compress images and media to under 100 KB.
HTML page size is ≤ 100 KB. Excellent.
Your HTML page size:
40.2 KB
| HTML Size | Interpretation | Status |
|---|---|---|
| ≤ 100 KB | Excellent (100) | Excellent |
| 100 KB - 200 KB | Good (75) | Good |
| 200 KB - 400 KB | Fair (50) | Fair |
| > 400 KB | Critical (25) | At Risk |
Current status: Excellent. Keep HTML as lean as possible for faster delivery and rendering.
Structured Data
At Risk
Metric Score: 0%
Checks Schema.org JSON-LD, Microdata, and RDFa in the submitted URL’s final server-rendered HTML. Any valid supported representation passes; this does not establish rich-result eligibility or sitewide coverage.
No Schema.org JSON-LD, Microdata, or RDFa was found in the submitted page's final server-rendered HTML. Add page-appropriate markup if this page has an eligible, useful entity to describe.
Scope: Submitted URL’s final server-rendered HTML only.
Representations: None
Browser-rendered markup, semantic completeness, rich-result eligibility, and sitewide/template coverage were not measured.
IP Canonicalization
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Tests every public A and AAAA address over HTTP and HTTPS. Only reproduced audited-site content without canonical host normalization fails; incomplete transport is indeterminate, and strict TLS behavior is retained separately.
Passed — audited site content was not reproduced by numeric address.
Outcome: No duplicate content
Checked: 2026-10-21T02:27:10+00:00
Canonical host: www.amazingknowledge.com
Numeric-Address Tests (2)
| Address | Scheme | Result | HTTP | Final URL | TLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
208.97.181.9 |
HTTP | Pass — unrelated content | 200 | http://208.97.181.9/ |
N/A |
208.97.181.9 |
HTTPS | Pass — content unavailable strict tls | 0 | https://208.97.181.9/ |
Strict unavailable |
Every public A and AAAA address was tested over HTTP and HTTPS. TLS certificate validation occurs before HTTP redirects; permissive TLS requests are diagnostic only. This result is distinct from URL canonicalization.
URL Canonicalization Test
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Separately tests HTTP to HTTPS, preferred hostname, canonical presence/uniqueness/final-URL match, path and query variants, redirect-chain length, and explicitly configured legacy domains.
URL canonicalization subtests passed. 9 pass, 0 fail, 2 indeterminate.
Checked: 2026-10-21T02:27:10+00:00
Final URL: https://www.amazingknowledge.com/
| Subtest | Result | Severity | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canonical Tag Present | Pass | Important | At least one non-empty canonical link was found. |
| Canonical Tag Unique | Pass | Important | Exactly one canonical link was found. |
| Canonical Tag Matches Final Url | Pass | Important | The canonical target matches the final audited URL. |
| Trailing Slash Normalization | Indeterminate | Warning | Trailing-slash normalization is not applicable to a root or file-like URL. |
| Http To Https | Pass | Pass | The variant resolves to the final audited URL. |
| Www To Preferred Hostname | Pass | Pass | The variant resolves to the final audited URL. |
| Index Php Normalization | Pass | Pass | The variant resolves to the final audited URL. |
| Query Parameter Canonicalization | Pass | Pass | The variant returns 200 but declares the correct final canonical URL. |
| Duplicate Slash Handling | Pass | Pass | The variant resolves to the final audited URL. |
| Redirect Chain Length | Pass | Warning | Every completed normalization probe used at most one redirect. |
| Legacy Domain Forwarding | Indeterminate | Important | No legacy domains or hosting-control inventory were configured. Legacy domains are not inferred from www variants or sitemap URLs. |
Detector LiquidPurple-SEOFront-URLCanonicalization/1.0; cache: fresh_network_probe. Canonical tags and redirects are separate. Unconfigured legacy domains do not fail the primary site.
Plain Text Email Test
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Plain text email addresses are vulnerable to scraping by bots, leading to spam. Obfuscate emails using CSS pseudo classes, reverse writing, or JavaScript.
Site passed plain text email test. No plain text email found.
GZIP Compression
At Risk
Metric Score: 0%
GZIP compression reduces page size for faster loading, especially for text-based content, achieving 70-90% compression rates. Enable GZIP and aim for a compressed size ≤ 33 KB. Avoid compressing already compressed assets like images.
No size reduction (still 40.2 KB).
Original Size: 40.2 KB
Compressed Size: 40.2 KB
Reduction: 0%
Inline CSS
At Risk
Metric Score: 15%
Inline CSS increases webpage loading time, impacting SEO. Move CSS to external .css files to improve performance and maintainability.
Your site has 166 inline CSS instances — excessive. Prioritise moving styles to external stylesheets.
Inline Styles (Top 15):
<i class="fa-fw fas fa-book" style="margin: 0px 6px 0px 0px;" ></i><i class="fa-fw fas fa-lock" style="margin: 0px 6px 0px 0px;" ></i><i class="fa-fw fas fa-file-alt" style="margin: 0px 6px 0px 0px;" ></i><i class="fa-fw fas fa-envelope" style="margin: 0px 6px 0px 0px;" ></i><i class="fa-fw fas fa-people-arrows" style="margin: 0px 6px 0px 0px;" ></i><i class="fa-fw fas fa-star" style="margin: 0px 6px 0px 0px;" ></i><i class="fa-fw fas fa-shopping-basket" style="margin: 0px 6px 0px 0px;" ></i><i class="fa-fw fas fa-envelope" style="margin: 0px 6px 0px 0px;" ></i><i class="fa-fw fas fa-money-bill-alt" style="margin: 0px 6px 0px 0px;" ></i><div class="shopping-cart-bottom" style="display: none"></div><i class="fa-fw fas fa-people-arrows" style="margin: 0px 6px 0px 0px;" ></i><i class="fa-fw fas fa-star" style="margin: 0px 6px 0px 0px;" ></i><i class="fa-fw fas fa-shopping-basket" style="margin: 0px 6px 0px 0px;" ></i><i class="fa-fw fas fa-envelope" style="margin: 0px 6px 0px 0px;" ></i><i class="fa-fw fas fa-money-bill-alt" style="margin: 0px 6px 0px 0px;" ></i>- ... and 151 more
Internal CSS
At Risk
Metric Score: 45%
Internal CSS (style blocks in HTML) can slow down page rendering. Move CSS to external .css files for better caching and maintainability.
Your site has 31 internal CSS blocks. Many may be injected by your optimiser or template — audit which are controllable.
Style Blocks (Top 15):
<style>img:is([sizes="auto" i], [sizes^="auto," i]) { contain-intrinsic-size: 3000px 1500px }</style><style id='wp-emoji-styles-inline-css'> img.wp-smiley, img.emoji { display: inline !important; border: none !important; box-shadow: ...<style id='classic-theme-styles-inline-css'> /*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;b...<style id='global-styles-inline-css'> :root{--wp--preset--aspect-ratio--square: 1;--wp--preset--aspect-ratio--4-3: 4/3;--wp--preset--aspect-...<style id='woocommerce-inline-inline-css'> .woocommerce form .form-row .required { visibility: visible; } </style><style id='dt-main-inline-css'> body #load { display: block; height: 100%; overflow: hidden; position: fixed; width: 100%; z-ind...<style>.woocommerce-product-gallery{ opacity: 1 !important; }</style><style type="text/css" data-type="vc_shortcodes-custom-css">.vc_custom_1501059079815{padding-top: 90px !important;padding-bottom: 50px !impo...<style> .wpb_animate_when_almost_visible { opacity: 1; }</style><style type="text/css"> [class*="the7-spinner-animate-"]{ animation: spinner-animation 1s cubic-bezier(1,1,1,1) infinite; ...<style id="the7-page-content-style"> #main { padding-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; } @media screen and (max-width: 778px) { #main { ...<style type="text/css" data-type="the7_shortcodes-inline-css">#default-btn-25f8118e44274e63b4d00a5f69e7c8c6.ico-right-side > i { margin-ri...<style type="text/css" data-type="the7_shortcodes-inline-css">#default-btn-1ca31c7511e566c16f18cc5a030806e1.ico-right-side > i { margin-ri...<style type="text/css" data-type="the7_shortcodes-inline-css">.shortcode-single-image-wrap.shortcode-single-image-6c7e67dfbcaff60b292b82ec0d...<style type="text/css" data-type="the7_shortcodes-inline-css">.products-shortcode.products-masonry-shortcode-id-987d04e48825dbfcae1918ccad97...- ... and 16 more
First Contentful Paint
At Risk
Metric Score: 49%
First Contentful Paint measures the time until the first content is rendered on mobile.
Your page render time needs attention. Optimize server response and resources. Desktop: 0.82s (Good). Mobile: 3.92s (Needs Work).
| FCP Value | Interpretation | Status |
|---|---|---|
| ≤ 1.0 s | Excellent (100) | Excellent |
| 1.0 s - 1.8 s | Good (declines from 100 to 80) | Good |
| 1.8 s - 3.0 s | Fair (declines from 80 to 40) | Fair |
| 3.0 s - 6.0 s | Needs Work (declines from 40 to 0) | Needs Work |
| > 6.0 s | At Risk (0) | At Risk |
This card uses weighted scoring (70% mobile, 30% desktop).
Speed Index
At Risk
Metric Score: 15%
Speed Index shows how quickly content is visually displayed on mobile.
Your page visually loads slowly. Optimize rendering and resources. Desktop: 3.49s (Needs Work). Mobile: 10.14s (Needs Work).
| Speed Index | Interpretation | Status |
|---|---|---|
| ≤ 1.5 s | Excellent (100) | Excellent |
| 1.5 s - 2.0 s | Good (declines from 100 to 80) | Good |
| 2.0 s - 4.0 s | Fair (declines from 80 to 40) | Fair |
| 4.0 s - 8.0 s | Needs Work (declines from 40 to 0) | Needs Work |
| > 8.0 s | At Risk (0) | At Risk |
This card uses weighted scoring (70% mobile, 30% desktop).
Total Blocking Time
Excellent
Metric Score: 96%
Total Blocking Time measures the total duration of long tasks (over 50 ms) that block the main thread during page load. High TBT means the page may feel unresponsive to user input. Optimize JavaScript execution, break up long tasks, and defer non-critical scripts to reduce blocking time.
Your site has minimal blocking time. Desktop: 257ms (Good). Mobile: 117ms (Good).
| TBT Value | Interpretation | Status |
|---|---|---|
| ≤ 150 ms | Excellent (100) | Excellent |
| 150 ms - 300 ms | Good (declines from 100 to 80) | Good |
| 300 ms - 600 ms | Fair (declines from 80 to 40) | Fair |
| 600 ms - 1200 ms | Needs Work (declines from 40 to 0) | Needs Work |
| > 1200 ms | At Risk (0) | At Risk |
This card uses weighted scoring (70% mobile, 30% desktop).
Largest Contentful Paint
At Risk
Metric Score: 30%
Largest Contentful Paint measures how long it takes for the largest visible content element (image, video, or text block) to render. Optimize images, improve server response times, and eliminate render-blocking resources to reduce LCP.
Your Largest Contentful Paint needs attention. Desktop: 2146 ms (Good). Mobile: 11401 ms (Needs Work).
| LCP Value | Interpretation | Status |
|---|---|---|
| ≤ 1.2 s | Excellent (100) | Excellent |
| 1.2 s - 2.5 s | Good (100) | Good |
| 2.5 s - 4.0 s | Fair (declines from 100 to 0) | Fair |
| > 4.0 s | At Risk (0) | At Risk |
This card uses desktop/mobile weighted scoring (70% mobile, 30% desktop).
Cumulative Layout Shift
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Cumulative Layout Shift measures the total of all unexpected layout shifts that occur during the page lifespan. Set explicit dimensions on images and videos, avoid inserting content above existing content, and use CSS containment to minimize layout instability.
Your page layout is stable. Desktop: 0.02 (Good). Mobile: 0 (Good).
| CLS Value | Interpretation | Status |
|---|---|---|
| ≤ 0.05 | Excellent (100) | Excellent |
| 0.05 - 0.10 | Good (declines from 100 to 80) | Good |
| 0.10 - 0.25 | Fair (declines from 80 to 40) | Fair |
| 0.25 - 0.50 | Needs Work (declines from 40 to 0) | Needs Work |
| > 0.50 | At Risk (0) | At Risk |
This card uses weighted scoring (70% mobile, 30% desktop).
Render Blocking Requests
At Risk
Metric Score: 5%
Render-blocking resources (scripts, stylesheets) delay the first paint of your page. Eliminate them by delivering critical JS/CSS inline, deferring non-critical scripts, and avoiding @import in CSS.
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. Eliminate render-blocking by delivering critical JS/CSS inline, deferring non-critical scripts, and avoiding @import in CSS.
Top Render-Blocking Resources:
Avoid Chaining Critical Requests
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Critical request chains represent resources that depend on each other to load. Reducing the length and size of these chains can speed up page loading. Use link rel=preload to load critical assets sooner.
No critical request chains detected. This is optimal.
Metric Score: N/A
Network round trip times (RTT) measure the latency of network requests. High RTT indicates slow server response or network congestion. Optimize server performance and use a CDN.
No network RTT data available.
Initial Server Response Time
Excellent
Metric Score: 95%
Server response time (TTFB) measures how long it takes for a browser to receive the first byte of page content. Optimize backend performance to improve this.
Your server responds in 35 milliseconds on mobile. This is optimal.
Unminified CSS
Good
Metric Score: 80%
Minifying CSS files can reduce network payload sizes.
Your page has 4 unminified CSS files on mobile. This is optimal.
Top Unminified CSS Files:
| # | URL | Total Size | Potential Savings | Savings % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 103.86 KB | 5.24 KB | 5.04% | |
| 2 | 26.96 KB | 3.23 KB | 11.96% | |
| 3 | 53.22 KB | 2.99 KB | 5.62% | |
| 4 | 59.38 KB | 2.76 KB | 4.66% |
Metric Score: 85%
Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time.
Your page has Mobile: 3, Desktop: 3 unminified JavaScript files. Consider minifying JavaScript files.
Top Unminified JavaScript Files:
| # | URL | Total Size | Potential Savings | Savings % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 387.42 KB | 96.91 KB | 25.01% | |
| 2 | 148.90 KB | 27.31 KB | 18.34% | |
| 3 | 35.64 KB | 8.23 KB | 23.10% |
Unused CSS Rules
Fair
Metric Score: 70%
Estimated savings: 1,050 ms / 170.7 KB
Unused CSS rules add unnecessary bytes to your page, slowing download and parse times. Identify and remove CSS that is not used on the page, or defer non-critical CSS to improve load performance.
Your page has 6 unused CSS files on mobile. Consider removing or deferring unused CSS.
Top Unused CSS Files:
| # | URL | Total Size | Potential Savings | Savings % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 102.93 KB | 50.78 KB | 49.33% | |
| 2 | 83.93 KB | 37.69 KB | 44.90% | |
| 3 | 58.45 KB | 24.89 KB | 42.58% | |
| 4 | 52.29 KB | 24.87 KB | 47.55% | |
| 5 | 42.15 KB | 20.77 KB | 49.26% |
Unused JavaScript
Fair
Metric Score: 70%
Unused JavaScript increases download size and parse/compile time, delaying interactivity. Remove unused code, use code splitting, and defer non-critical scripts to reduce the JavaScript payload.
Your page has 6 unused JavaScript files on mobile. Consider removing or deferring unused code.
Top Unused JavaScript Files:
| # | URL | Total Size | Potential Savings | Savings % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 346.32 KB | 243.64 KB | 70.35% | |
| 2 | 193.70 KB | 152.42 KB | 78.69% | |
| 3 | 96.09 KB | 63.69 KB | 66.29% | |
| 4 | 74.29 KB | 50.56 KB | 68.05% | |
| 5 | 95.68 KB | 43.03 KB | 44.97% |
Uses Optimized Images
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Serve images in modern formats (WebP, AVIF), compress them appropriately, and deliver correctly sized images for each viewport. Unoptimized images are often the single largest source of page weight, directly increasing load time and data usage. Use responsive images with srcset, lazy-load offscreen images, and apply lossy or lossless compression to reduce file size without visible quality loss.
No unoptimized images detected. This is optimal.
Unoptimized Images: No unoptimized images detected
Uses Text Compression
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Enable text-based resource compression (Gzip or Brotli) on your server for HTML, CSS, JavaScript, SVG, and JSON responses. Compression typically reduces transfer size by 60–80%, significantly improving load time. Configure your web server or CDN to compress all text-based MIME types and verify with response headers (Content-Encoding: gzip or br).
No uncompressed text resources detected. This is optimal.
Uncompressed Resources: No uncompressed text resources detected
Uses Rel Preconnect
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Use <link rel="preconnect"> to establish early connections to important third-party origins, saving DNS lookup, TCP handshake, and TLS negotiation time. This is especially valuable for fonts, analytics, CDN assets, and API endpoints loaded early in the page lifecycle. Limit preconnects to 2–4 critical origins to avoid connection contention.
No missing preconnect opportunities detected. This is optimal.
Missing Preconnect Origins: No missing preconnect opportunities detected
Server Response Time
Excellent
Metric Score: 95%
Initial Server Response Time (Time to First Byte) measures how long the server takes to respond to the first request. Optimize server-side processing, use caching, upgrade hosting infrastructure, and minimize redirects to reduce TTFB.
Your server responds in 35 milliseconds on mobile. This is optimal.
Redirects
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Page redirects add extra network round trips before content can be loaded, increasing latency. Eliminate unnecessary redirects, update internal links to point directly to final URLs, and ensure HTTPS redirects are minimal.
Your page has 0 redirects on mobile. This is optimal.
Redirects: No redirects detected
Efficient Animated Content
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Replace large GIF animations with video formats (MP4, WebM) which are significantly smaller and can be hardware-decoded. Animated GIFs are extremely inefficient — a 10-second GIF can easily exceed 10 MB while the equivalent MP4 may be under 500 KB. Use <video autoplay loop muted playsinline> as a drop-in replacement, and consider CSS animations or Lottie for UI animations.
No inefficient animated content detected. This is optimal.
Inefficient Animated Content: No inefficient animated content detected
Non-Composited Animations
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Non-composited animations run on the main thread instead of the GPU, causing jank and poor visual performance. Use CSS properties like transform and opacity for animations, which can be GPU-accelerated and run on the compositor thread.
Your page has 0 non-composited animations on mobile. This is optimal.
Non-Composited Animations: No non-composited animations detected
Total Byte Weight
At Risk
Measured Value: 0% (6,309 KiB)
Metric Score: 0%
Total Byte Weight measures the total size of all resources loaded by the page. Reduce resource sizes for better performance.
Your page has a total byte weight of 6309.07 KB on mobile. Reduce resource sizes urgently.
| Total Size | Score Interpretation | Status |
|---|---|---|
| ≤ 400 KB | Excellent (80-100) | Good |
| 400 KB - 800 KB | Fair (60-79) | Fair |
| > 800 KB | Needs Work (< 60) | Needs Work |
Score = 100 - (Bytes / 20,000). A lighter page loads faster.
DOM Size
At Risk
Metric Score: 48%
Reduce DOM node count to speed up page rendering.
Your page has 1559 DOM elements on mobile. Reduce DOM size urgently.
DOM Statistics:
- Total elements: 1559
- DOM depth: 24
- Most children: 65
User Timings
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Use User Timing API marks/measures to understand performance bottlenecks.
User timings are informative. Review timings to optimize key page events.
User Timings: No user timings detected
Bootup Time
At Risk
Metric Score: 47%
Reduce JavaScript execution time to improve responsiveness.
Your page has a JavaScript execution time of 1062.94 ms on mobile. Optimize scripts urgently.
Scripts with High Execution Time (Top 5):
- /wp-content/plugins/revslider/public/js/libs/tptoo...: 1,327.87 ms
- /wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js: 783.14 ms
- /: 332.99 ms
- Unattributable: 245.52 ms
- /wp-content/plugins/revslider/public/js/sr7.js: 137.60 ms
Mainthread Work Breakdown
Needs Work
Metric Score: 60%
Reduce main-thread tasks to improve responsiveness.
Your page has a main thread work time of 3217.73 ms on mobile. Optimize main thread tasks urgently.
Main Thread Tasks (Top 5 by Duration):
- Script Evaluation: 1,025.72 ms
- Style & Layout: 905.10 ms
- Other: 720.79 ms
- Script Parsing & Compilation: 214.07 ms
- Rendering: 206.47 ms
Font Display
Fair
Metric Score: 75%
Ensure text remains visible during webfont loading.
Your page has 5 fonts without font-display on mobile. Consider adding font-display: swap for faster text rendering.
Fonts Without Font-Display (Top 5 by Impact):
- /wp-content/themes/dt-the7/fonts/FontAwesome/webfo...: 175.00 ms
- /wp-content/uploads/smile_fonts/icomoon-font-aweso...: 120.00 ms
- /wp-content/themes/dt-the7/fonts/icomoon-the7-font...: 115.00 ms
- /s/opensans/v44/memvYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2...: 5.00 ms
- /s/robotoslab/v36/BngMUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6ufN5qWr4xCC...: 5.00 ms
Resource Summary
At Risk
Metric Score: 30%
Minimize the number of requests and total transfer size to improve page load performance. Fewer requests and smaller transfer sizes reduce latency and improve user experience, especially on mobile devices.
Reduce requests to under 50 (current: 111). Combine CSS/JS files and optimize images. Transfer size (6,309.16 KB) is too large. Compress images and minify assets.
Desktop Resources:
- Third-party: 7 requests, 445.79 KB
- Font: 6 requests, 373.27 KB
- Stylesheet: 37 requests, 275.74 KB
- Document: 1 requests, 40.79 KB
- Other: 4 requests, 6.89 KB
- Third-party: 7 requests, 445.70 KB
- Font: 6 requests, 373.18 KB
- Stylesheet: 37 requests, 275.74 KB
- Document: 1 requests, 40.78 KB
- Other: 4 requests, 6.89 KB
No Document Write
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
No Document Write checks for document.write() calls, which can delay page rendering. Avoid using document.write() for better performance.
No document.write() calls detected. This is optimal.
Document Write Instances: No document.write() calls detected
Unsized Images
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Unsized Images checks for images without explicit width and height, which can cause layout shifts. Set dimensions to improve performance.
No unsized images detected. This is optimal.
Unsized Images: No unsized images detected
Uses Rel Preload
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Use <link rel="preload"> to prioritize fetching critical resources that are discovered late in the page load (e.g., fonts referenced in CSS, hero images, key scripts). Preloading tells the browser to start downloading these resources immediately rather than waiting until they are naturally discovered during parsing. Limit preloads to 3–5 truly critical resources to avoid bandwidth contention.
No resources identified for preload. This is optimal.
Resources to Preload: No resources identified for preload
Duplicated JavaScript
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Remove duplicate JavaScript modules to reduce bundle size and parse/compile time. Use code splitting and tree shaking to eliminate redundant code.
No duplicated JavaScript detected. This is optimal.
Duplicated Scripts: No duplicated JavaScript detected
Long Tasks
N/A
Metric Score: N/A
Long tasks (>50ms) block the main thread and delay responsiveness. Break up long-running JavaScript into smaller chunks using techniques like code splitting, web workers, or yielding to the browser.
No long tasks detected. This is optimal.
Long Tasks: No long tasks detected
Efficient Cache Policy
Needs Work
Metric Score: 65%
Estimated savings: 281.6 KB
Cache-Control headers tell browsers how long to reuse a resource before re-fetching it. Short or missing TTLs force unnecessary network requests on repeat visits, slowing page load. Score is based on first-party wasted bytes plus 15% of third-party waste (0 KB = 100, <= 50 KB = 90, <= 150 KB = 80, <= 300 KB = 65, <= 750 KB = 40). Third-party resources carry reduced weight since they are outside your direct control.
3 first-party resources (281.6 KB wasted).
| Platform | Potential Savings | 1st-Party Items | 3rd-Party Items |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 281.6 KB | 3 | 0 |
| Desktop | 281.6 KB | 3 | 0 |
| First-Party Wasted Bytes | Score | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 0 KB | 100 | Excellent |
| ≤ 50 KB | 90 | Good |
| ≤ 150 KB | 80 | Acceptable |
| ≤ 300 KB | 65 | Fair |
| ≤ 750 KB | 40 | Needs Work |
| > 750 KB | 20 | At Risk |
Third-party waste is weighted at 15% to reflect real-world impact without over-penalising for resources outside your control.
- /wp-content/themes/dt-the7/fonts/FontAwesome/webfonts/f... — 155.4 KB · TTL: none · Savings: 155.4 KB
- /wp-content/uploads/smile_fonts/icomoon-font-awesome-14... — 102.5 KB · TTL: none · Savings: 102.5 KB
- /wp-content/themes/dt-the7/fonts/icomoon-the7-font/icom... — 23.8 KB · TTL: none · Savings: 23.8 KB
Improve Image Delivery
At Risk
Metric Score: 15%
Use modern image formats (WebP/AVIF), responsive images, and efficient encoding to reduce payload and improve loading speed.
Consider using modern image formats (WebP/AVIF), responsive images, and efficient encoding. Potential savings: 1328.4 KiB.
Images to Optimize — Mobile (4 images, 1,328.4 KiB total savings):
- /wp-content/uploads/revslider/the7-small-store-slider/slider... — 639.6 KiB savings (total: 703.8 KiB)
- /wp-content/uploads/revslider/the7-small-store-slider/slider... — 639.6 KiB savings (total: 703.8 KiB)
- /wp-content/uploads/slid-02.jpg — 37.8 KiB savings (total: 233.1 KiB)
- /wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Amazing_Knowledge_logo-SM.png — 11.3 KiB savings (total: 12.9 KiB)
Legacy JavaScript
At Risk
Metric Score: 15%
Avoid serving legacy JavaScript polyfills to modern browsers. Use module/nomodule pattern or differential serving to reduce unnecessary code.
Avoid serving legacy JavaScript to modern browsers. Use module/nomodule pattern or differential serving.
Legacy Scripts (Top 5):
- /wp-content/plugins/nextgen-gallery/static/Gallery... — 9.9 KB wasted
- /wp-content/plugins/pdf-print/js/jspdf.js — 9.0 KB wasted
Avoid Forced Reflow
At Risk
Metric Score: 15%
A forced reflow (layout thrashing) happens when JavaScript reads a layout property — such as offsetWidth, offsetHeight, getBoundingClientRect(), or getComputedStyle() — right after changing the DOM or CSS styles. This forces the browser to stop and recalculate the page layout synchronously, blocking the main thread and causing visible jank or frozen interfaces. Scored by total reflow time: 0ms = 100, ≤30ms = 90, ≤100ms = 75, ≤250ms = 50, ≤500ms = 30, >500ms = 15.
Forced reflow detected (1042.9 ms). Batch DOM reads before writes, use requestAnimationFrame() for visual updates, avoid reading layout properties inside loops, and prefer CSS transform/opacity for animations.
Scoring Thresholds:
Reflow Sources (10):
| Reflow Time | Score | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 0 ms | 100 | Excellent |
| ≤ 30 ms | 90 | Good |
| ≤ 100 ms | 75 | Fair |
| ≤ 250 ms | 50 | Needs Work |
| ≤ 500 ms | 30 | Needs Work |
| > 500 ms | 15 | At Risk |
| Source | Reflow Time |
|---|---|
https://www.amazingknowledge.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js |
156.9 ms |
https://www.amazingknowledge.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js |
93.8 ms |
https://www.amazingknowledge.com/ |
40.5 ms |
[unattributed] |
35.6 ms |
https://www.amazingknowledge.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js |
28.8 ms |
https://www.amazingknowledge.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js |
22.7 ms |
https://www.amazingknowledge.com/wp-content/themes/dt-the7/js/main.min.js |
20.3 ms |
https://www.amazingknowledge.com/ |
17.7 ms |
https://www.amazingknowledge.com/wp-content/plugins/revslider/public/js/libs/tptools.js |
12.6 ms |
https://www.amazingknowledge.com/wp-content/themes/dt-the7/js/above-the-fold.min.js |
12.3 ms |
How to Fix Forced Reflow:
- Batch DOM reads before writes — read all layout properties first, then make all DOM changes.
- Use
requestAnimationFrame()— schedule visual updates to avoid mid-frame style recalculations. - Avoid reading layout props in loops — reading
offsetWidth,getBoundingClientRect(), orgetComputedStyle()inside a loop forces layout on every iteration. - Prefer CSS transform/opacity — these properties are compositor-only and never trigger layout.
- Use a FastDOM library — batches reads and writes automatically.
Network Dependency Tree
At Risk
Metric Score: 58%
Network dependency chains create waterfall delays where each resource must wait for its parent to finish loading. Scored by chain duration (<=500ms = 100, <=1s = 90, <=2s = 80, <=3s = 70, <=5s = 60) with penalties for deep chains (depth 3+). Reduce chain depth by preloading key resources, inline critical assets, and defer non-critical downloads.
Mobile: 3106ms, depth 3 · Desktop: 2745ms, depth 3.
| Platform | Longest Chain | Depth |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 3106ms | 3 |
| Desktop | 2745ms | 3 |
| Chain Duration | Base Score | Status |
|---|---|---|
| ≤ 500ms | 100 | Excellent |
| ≤ 1,000ms | 85 | Good |
| ≤ 2,000ms | 70 | Fair |
| ≤ 3,000ms | 50 | Needs Work |
| ≤ 5,000ms | 30 | Needs Work |
| > 5,000ms | 15 | At Risk |
Depth penalties: 3 → −5 · 4 → −10 · 5+ → −15. Combined: 70% mobile / 30% desktop.
- /wp-content/plugins/pdf-print/js/jspdf.js 3106ms · 194.2 KB
- /wp-content/plugins/newsletter/main.js 3105ms · 0.8 KB
- /wp-content/themes/dt-the7/js/atoms/plugins/validator/jquery... 3104ms · 18.3 KB
- /wp-content/plugins/nextgen-gallery/static/Lightbox/fancybox... 3103ms · 2.6 KB
- /wp-content/plugins/live-sales-notifications-for-woocommerce... 3102ms · 4.1 KB
Avoid Meta Refresh
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Avoid using meta refresh to prevent accessibility issues on mobile. <strong><a class="text-danger" target="_BLANK" href="https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.10/meta-refresh">Learn More</a></strong>
Avoid using meta refresh to prevent accessibility issues on mobile. Audit data is missing.
Raw Score: N/A
Meta Refresh Issues: No meta refresh issues detected
ARIA Tooltip Name
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Provide descriptive names for ARIA tooltips on mobile. <strong><a class="text-danger" target="_BLANK" href="https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.10/aria-tooltip-name">Learn More</a></strong>
Provide descriptive names for ARIA tooltips on mobile. Audit data is missing.
Raw Score: N/A
Tooltip Name Issues: No tooltip name issues detected
Valid HTML Language
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Ensure HTML has a valid language code for accessibility.
Ensure the HTML lang attribute has a valid value on mobile. Audit data is missing.
Raw Score: N/A
Valid HTML Language Issues: No invalid language code issues detected
HTML Has Language
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Include a lang attribute on the HTML element for mobile. Audit data is missing.
Raw Score: N/A
HTML Language Issues: No missing language attribute issues detected
ARIA Required Parent
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Ensure ARIA roles have required parent elements on mobile. Audit data is missing.
Raw Score: N/A
ARIA Required Parent Issues: No missing parent role issues detected
Meta Viewport
At Risk
Metric Score: 0%
A valid viewport meta tag is required for mobile accessibility and responsive rendering. Use <code><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"></code>, and avoid settings that disable zoom (for example, <code>maximum-scale</code> or <code>user-scalable=no</code>).
Fix 1 viewport issue. Use width=device-width with initial-scale=1, and avoid disabling zoom with maximum-scale or user-scalable=no.
Raw Score: 0%
Meta Viewport Issues (Top 5):
- Invalid viewport configuration: Fix any of the following: user-scalable on <meta> tag disables zooming on mobile devices
Avoid Duplicate ARIA IDs
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Avoid duplicate ARIA IDs to ensure screen readers work correctly on mobile. <strong><a class="text-danger" target="_BLANK" href="https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.10/duplicate-id-aria">Learn More</a></strong>
Avoid duplicate ARIA IDs for mobile accessibility. Audit data is missing.
Raw Score: N/A
Duplicate ARIA ID Issues: No duplicate ARIA ID issues detected
Valid ARIA Attributes
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Use valid ARIA attributes to ensure assistive technologies work correctly on mobile. <strong><a class="text-danger" target="_BLANK" href="https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.10/aria-valid-attr">Learn More</a></strong>
Use valid ARIA attributes for mobile screen reader compatibility. Audit data is missing.
Raw Score: N/A
Valid ARIA Attribute Issues: No invalid ARIA attribute issues detected
Access Keys
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Use access keys appropriately for mobile navigation. Audit data is missing.
Raw Score: N/A
Access Key Issues: No access key issues detected
Form Field Multiple Labels
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Ensure form fields have a single, clear label on mobile. Audit data is missing.
Raw Score: N/A
Form Field Multiple Label Issues: No form field multiple label issues detected
Valid Language Attribute
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Use valid language codes for mobile accessibility. Audit data is missing.
Raw Score: N/A
Valid Language Attribute Issues: No invalid language attribute issues detected
ARIA Treeitem Name
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Ensure ARIA treeitems have accessible names on mobile. Audit data is missing.
Raw Score: N/A
ARIA Treeitem Name Issues: No treeitem naming issues detected
ARIA Toggle Field Name
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Provide names for ARIA toggle fields on mobile.
Provide names for ARIA toggle fields on mobile. Audit data is missing.
Toggle Field Naming Issues: No toggle field naming issues detected
ARIA Progressbar Name
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Ensure ARIA progressbars have accessible names on mobile.
Provide accessible names for ARIA progressbars on mobile. Audit data is missing.
Raw Score: N/A
Progressbar Naming Issues: No progressbar naming issues detected
ARIA Required Attribute
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Include required ARIA attributes for mobile elements.
Include required ARIA attributes for mobile elements. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.
Raw Score: 100%
Missing ARIA Attribute Issues: No missing required ARIA attribute issues detected
ARIA Command Name
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Provide accessible names for ARIA commands on mobile.
Provide accessible names for ARIA commands on mobile. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.
Score: 100%
Command Naming Issues: No command naming issues detected
ARIA Required Children
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
ARIA Required Children checks if ARIA parent roles contain required child roles for screen readers. Ensure proper role nesting.
Ensure ARIA roles include required child elements on mobile. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.
Raw Score: 100%
Required Children Issues: No required children issues detected
Table Headers with Data Cells
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Ensure table headers are associated with data cells on mobile.
Ensure table headers are associated with data cells on mobile. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.
Raw Score: 100%
Table Header Data Cell Issues: No table header data cell issues detected
ARIA Input Field Name
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Provide accessible names for ARIA input fields on mobile.
Provide accessible names for ARIA input fields on mobile. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.
Raw Score: 100%
Input Field Naming Issues: No input field naming issues detected
Tab Index
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Use tab-index appropriately for mobile navigation.
Use tab-index appropriately for mobile navigation. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.
Raw Score: 100%
Tab Index Issues: No tab index issues detected
Definition List Item
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Ensure definition list items are structured properly on mobile.
Ensure definition list items are structured properly on mobile. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.
Raw Score: 100%
Definition List Item Issues: No definition list item issues detected
Bypass Blocks
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Provide a way to bypass repetitive content on mobile.
Provide a way to bypass repetitive content on mobile. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.
Raw Score: 100%
Bypass Blocks Issues: No bypass blocks issues detected
ARIA Roles
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Use valid ARIA roles to enhance mobile accessibility.
Use valid ARIA roles to enhance mobile accessibility. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.
Raw Score: 100%
ARIA Role Issues: No ARIA role issues detected
ARIA Meter Name
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Provide accessible names for ARIA meters on mobile.
Provide accessible names for ARIA meters on mobile. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.
Raw Score: 100%
Meter Naming Issues: No meter naming issues detected
Input Image Alt Text
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Provide alt text for input images to ensure mobile accessibility.
Provide alt text for input images to ensure mobile accessibility. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.
Raw Score: 100%
Image Input Issues: No image input alt text issues detected
Link Name
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Ensure links have descriptive names for mobile accessibility.
Ensure links have descriptive names for mobile accessibility. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.
Raw Score: 100%
Link Naming Issues: No link naming issues detected
Metric Score: 75%
Detects known JavaScript libraries via signature matching and supplements results with script payload/network context. Signature misses can occur with bundled or custom builds; smaller, intentional dependencies (especially third-party scripts) usually improve performance, maintainability, and security.
No external JavaScript libraries detected. This is excellent if your site works as intended without them. Script payload observed: 1064.1 KB across 50 script requests. Scripts were detected, but Lighthouse did not match them to known library signatures. This can happen with custom bundles, renamed files, or inlined/compiled vendor code.
Observed script payload: 1,064.1 KB across 50 script requests.
External scripts: 0
Detected JavaScript libraries:
0 found
| Detected Count | Score Threshold | Interpretation | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100 | No external libs (excellent if intentional) | Excellent |
| 1 - 3 | 100 | Lean dependency footprint | Excellent |
| 4 - 5 | 85 | Reasonable, review overlap | Warning |
| 6 - 7 | 65 | High dependency count | Warning |
| 8+ | 40 | Too many dependencies | At Risk |
| Script Payload (KB) | Extra Score Adjustment | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 700 KB | 0 | Generally manageable payload |
| 700 KB - 1.5 MB | -10 | Heavier script footprint |
| 1.5 MB - 2.5 MB | -20 | Likely impactful on load/parse |
| > 2.5 MB | -30 | High performance risk |
Which libraries were found? None detected.
Why this can happen: Scripts were detected, but we did not match known library signatures (common with bundled/minified/custom builds).
Is that good? Usually yes—if all required features work. Fewer dependencies generally means better performance, fewer security updates, and easier maintenance.
How to keep this score high: prefer vanilla JS/web APIs, remove dead scripts, and avoid adding libraries for one-off utilities.
External scripts carry added performance and security risk—keep third-party JS minimal. See “Vulnerable Libraries” for security follow-up.
HTML Doctype
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Specifying a doctype prevents the browser from switching to quirks mode, ensuring consistent rendering.
Page has the HTML doctype
Page has the HTML doctype.
Uses HTTPS
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
All sites should be protected with HTTPS. HTTPS prevents intruders from tampering with or listening to communications between your site and users.
Uses HTTPS
Page is served over HTTPS.
Avoid Geolocation on Start
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Requesting geolocation permission on page load erodes user trust. Wait for a user gesture before requesting the permission.
Avoids requesting the geolocation permission on page load
Page does not request geolocation permission on load.
Responsive Image Sizes
At Risk
Metric Score: 0%
Serve images that are appropriately sized for the device to prevent layout shifts and wasted bandwidth.
Serves images with low resolution
3 issues found:
| # | URL / Resource |
|---|---|
| 1 | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Amazing_Knowledge_logo-SM.png |
| 2 | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/wp-content/plugins/pdf-print/images/pdf.png |
| 3 | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/wp-content/plugins/pdf-print/images/print.png |
Image Aspect Ratio
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Image display dimensions should match the natural aspect ratio to prevent visual distortion.
Displays images with correct aspect ratio
All images display with correct aspect ratio.
No Inspector Issues
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Chrome DevTools Inspector reports issues such as mixed content, CORS errors, and deprecated features.
No issues in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools
No issues detected in Chrome DevTools.
Avoid Deprecated APIs
At Risk
Metric Score: 0%
Deprecated APIs will eventually be removed from the browser, causing breakage. Migrate to modern alternatives.
Uses deprecated APIs
1 issue found:
| # | Detail |
|---|---|
| 1 | https://www.amazingknowledge.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js |
Keyword Density Analysis
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Keyword density analysis shows word frequency on your page. Maintain natural content with 1-2% keyword density to avoid keyword stuffing penalties.
Keyword density analysis available. Review word frequency to ensure natural content without keyword stuffing.
Analysis of word frequency and density on your page. High keyword density may indicate keyword stuffing.
Single Keywords
| Keyword | Occurrence | Density % | Possible Spam |
|---|---|---|---|
| – | 42 | 2.687 % | No |
| ac | 21 | 1.344 % | No |
| nec | 20 | 1.28 % | No |
| product | 14 | 0.896 % | No |
| ipsum | 13 | 0.832 % | No |
| page | 12 | 0.768 % | No |
| erat | 12 | 0.768 % | No |
| options | 12 | 0.768 % | No |
| tincidunt | 11 | 0.704 % | No |
| sed | 11 | 0.704 % | No |
| rutrum | 11 | 0.704 % | No |
| lorem | 11 | 0.704 % | No |
| content | 10 | 0.64 % | No |
| nisl | 10 | 0.64 % | No |
| glavrida | 10 | 0.64 % | No |
| products | 9 | 0.576 % | No |
| range | 9 | 0.576 % | No |
| business | 8 | 0.512 % | No |
| enim | 8 | 0.512 % | No |
| Morbi | 8 | 0.512 % | No |
| volutpat | 8 | 0.512 % | No |
| digital | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| imperdiet | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| faucibusd | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| liquam | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| amet | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| eu | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| Select | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| sit | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| odio | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
Two-Word Keywords
| Keyword Phrase | Occurrence | Density % | Possible Spam |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10am – | 13 | 0.832 % | No |
| – 3pm | 9 | 0.576 % | No |
| – lorem | 8 | 0.512 % | No |
| sed rutrum | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| rutrum nec | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| nec imperdiet | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| imperdiet ac | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| faucibusd ac | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| ac – | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| lorem glavrida | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| glavrida liquam | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| liquam erat | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| erat volutpat | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| the product | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| page opens | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| opens in | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| in new | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| tincidunt sed | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| ac enim | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| enim Morbi | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| Morbi faucibusd | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| Select options | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| options This | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| This product | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| product has | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| has multiple | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| multiple variants | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| variants The | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| The options | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| options may | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
Three-Word Keywords
| Keyword Phrase | Occurrence | Density % | Possible Spam |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10am – 3pm | 9 | 0.576 % | No |
| sed rutrum nec | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| rutrum nec imperdiet | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| nec imperdiet ac | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| faucibusd ac – | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| ac – lorem | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| – lorem glavrida | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| lorem glavrida liquam | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| glavrida liquam erat | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| liquam erat volutpat | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| page opens in | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| opens in new | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| tincidunt sed rutrum | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| imperdiet ac enim | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| ac enim Morbi | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| enim Morbi faucibusd | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| Morbi faucibusd ac | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| Select options This | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| options This product | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| This product has | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
Four-Word Keywords
| Keyword Phrase | Occurrence | Density % | Possible Spam |
|---|---|---|---|
| sed rutrum nec imperdiet | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| rutrum nec imperdiet ac | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| faucibusd ac – lorem | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| ac – lorem glavrida | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| – lorem glavrida liquam | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| lorem glavrida liquam erat | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| glavrida liquam erat volutpat | 7 | 0.448 % | No |
| page opens in new | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| tincidunt sed rutrum nec | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| nec imperdiet ac enim | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| imperdiet ac enim Morbi | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| ac enim Morbi faucibusd | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| enim Morbi faucibusd ac | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| Morbi faucibusd ac – | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| Select options This product | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| options This product has | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| This product has multiple | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| product has multiple variants | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| has multiple variants The | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
| multiple variants The options | 6 | 0.384 % | No |
Note: Optimal keyword density is typically 1-2%. Higher densities may be flagged as keyword stuffing by search engines.
Third-Party Code Impact
Excellent
Metric Score: 100%
Third-party code (ads, analytics, social widgets) can significantly impact page performance. Optimize loading strategies and consider lazy-loading non-critical scripts.
No third-party code detected.
No third-party code detected on your page.
Scoring Summary
Desktop Performance Metrics
| Metric | Raw Score | Weight | Score | Overall Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop Performance - Total Blocking Time | 96.00% | 5 (3.91%) | 3.75 / 3.91 | 60.00 / 9,420.80 (0.64%) |
| Desktop Performance - Largest Contentful Paint | 30.00% | 5 (3.91%) | 1.17 / 3.91 | 18.75 / 9,420.80 (0.20%) |
| Desktop Performance - Cumulative Layout Shift | 100.00% | 5 (3.91%) | 3.91 / 3.91 | 62.50 / 9,420.80 (0.66%) |
| Desktop Performance - First Contentful Paint | 49.00% | 3 (2.34%) | 1.15 / 2.34 | 18.38 / 9,420.80 (0.20%) |
| Desktop Performance - Speed Index | 15.00% | 3 (2.34%) | 0.35 / 2.34 | 5.63 / 9,420.80 (0.06%) |
| Desktop Performance - Minify CSS | 80.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 1.25 / 1.56 | 20.00 / 9,420.80 (0.21%) |
| Desktop Performance - Minify JavaScript | 85.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 1.33 / 1.56 | 21.25 / 9,420.80 (0.23%) |
| Desktop Performance - Remove Unused CSS Rules | 70.00% | 3 (2.34%) | 1.64 / 2.34 | 26.25 / 9,420.80 (0.28%) |
| Desktop Performance - Remove Unused JavaScript | 70.00% | 3 (2.34%) | 1.64 / 2.34 | 26.25 / 9,420.80 (0.28%) |
| Desktop Performance - Eliminate Render-Blocking Resources | 30.08% | 5 (3.91%) | 1.18 / 3.91 | 18.80 / 9,420.80 (0.20%) |
| Desktop Performance - Avoid Chaining Critical Requests | 100.00% | 3 (2.34%) | 2.34 / 2.34 | 37.50 / 9,420.80 (0.40%) |
| Desktop Performance - Network Round Trip Times | — | 2 (1.56%) | — | No data |
| Desktop Performance - Initial Server Response Time | 95.00% | 4 (3.13%) | 2.97 / 3.13 | 47.50 / 9,420.80 (0.50%) |
| Desktop Performance - Avoid Multiple Page Redirects | 100.00% | 3 (2.34%) | 2.34 / 2.34 | 37.50 / 9,420.80 (0.40%) |
| Desktop Performance - Non-Composited Animations | 100.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 1.56 / 1.56 | 25.00 / 9,420.80 (0.27%) |
| Desktop Performance - Avoid Enormous Network Payloads | 0.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 0.00 / 1.56 | 0.00 / 9,420.80 (0.00%) |
| Desktop Performance - DOM Size | 48.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 0.75 / 1.56 | 12.00 / 9,420.80 (0.13%) |
| Desktop Performance - User Timings | 100.00% | 9 (7.03%) | 7.03 / 7.03 | 112.50 / 9,420.80 (1.19%) |
| Desktop Performance - JavaScript Execution Time | 46.00% | 9 (7.03%) | 3.23 / 7.03 | 51.75 / 9,420.80 (0.55%) |
| Desktop Performance - Minimize Main-Thread Work | 58.00% | 9 (7.03%) | 4.08 / 7.03 | 65.25 / 9,420.80 (0.69%) |
| Desktop Performance - Ensure Text Visible During Webfont Load | 50.00% | 9 (7.03%) | 3.52 / 7.03 | 56.25 / 9,420.80 (0.60%) |
| Desktop Performance - Resources Summary | 30.00% | 9 (7.03%) | 2.11 / 7.03 | 33.75 / 9,420.80 (0.36%) |
| Desktop Performance - Use Efficient Cache Lifetimes | 100.00% | 3 (2.34%) | 2.34 / 2.34 | 37.50 / 9,420.80 (0.40%) |
| Desktop Performance - Improve Image Delivery | 15.00% | 3 (2.34%) | 0.35 / 2.34 | 5.63 / 9,420.80 (0.06%) |
| Desktop Performance - Avoid Serving Legacy JavaScript to Modern Browsers | 50.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 0.78 / 1.56 | 12.50 / 9,420.80 (0.13%) |
| Desktop Performance - Avoid Forced Reflow | 15.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 0.23 / 1.56 | 3.75 / 9,420.80 (0.04%) |
| Desktop Performance - Network Dependency Tree | 65.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 1.02 / 1.56 | 16.25 / 9,420.80 (0.17%) |
| Desktop Performance - Images with Explicit Dimensions | 80.00% | 5 (3.91%) | 3.13 / 3.91 | 50.00 / 9,420.80 (0.53%) |
| Desktop Performance - Optimized Images | 100.00% | 3 (2.34%) | 2.34 / 2.34 | 37.50 / 9,420.80 (0.40%) |
| Desktop Performance - Text Compression | 100.00% | 3 (2.34%) | 2.34 / 2.34 | 37.50 / 9,420.80 (0.40%) |
| Desktop Performance - Preconnect to Required Origins | 100.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 1.56 / 1.56 | 25.00 / 9,420.80 (0.27%) |
| Desktop Performance - Efficient Animated Content | 100.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 1.56 / 1.56 | 25.00 / 9,420.80 (0.27%) |
| Desktop Performance - Preload Key Requests | 100.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 1.56 / 1.56 | 25.00 / 9,420.80 (0.27%) |
| Total Desktop Performance | 64.53 / 98.44 | 1,032.43 / 9,420.80 (10.96%) | ||
Mobile Performance Metrics
| Metric | Raw Score | Weight | Score | Overall Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile Performance - First Contentful Paint | 49.00% | 3 (2.34%) | 1.15 / 2.34 | 27.56 / 9,420.80 (0.29%) |
| Mobile Performance - Speed Index | 15.00% | 3 (2.34%) | 0.35 / 2.34 | 8.44 / 9,420.80 (0.09%) |
| Mobile Performance - Total Blocking Time | 96.00% | 5 (3.91%) | 3.75 / 3.91 | 90.00 / 9,420.80 (0.96%) |
| Mobile Performance - Largest Contentful Paint | 30.00% | 5 (3.91%) | 1.17 / 3.91 | 28.13 / 9,420.80 (0.30%) |
| Mobile Performance - Cumulative Layout Shift | 100.00% | 5 (3.91%) | 3.91 / 3.91 | 93.75 / 9,420.80 (1.00%) |
| Mobile Performance - Minify CSS | 80.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 1.25 / 1.56 | 30.00 / 9,420.80 (0.32%) |
| Mobile Performance - Minify JavaScript | 85.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 1.33 / 1.56 | 31.88 / 9,420.80 (0.34%) |
| Mobile Performance - Remove Unused CSS Rules | 70.00% | 3 (2.34%) | 1.64 / 2.34 | 39.38 / 9,420.80 (0.42%) |
| Mobile Performance - Remove Unused JavaScript | 70.00% | 3 (2.34%) | 1.64 / 2.34 | 39.38 / 9,420.80 (0.42%) |
| Mobile Performance - Eliminate Render-Blocking Resources | 5.00% | 5 (3.91%) | 0.20 / 3.91 | 4.69 / 9,420.80 (0.05%) |
| Mobile Performance - Avoid Chaining Critical Requests | 100.00% | 3 (2.34%) | 2.34 / 2.34 | 56.25 / 9,420.80 (0.60%) |
| Mobile Performance - Network Round Trip Times | — | 2 (1.56%) | — | No data |
| Mobile Performance - Initial Server Response Time | 95.00% | 4 (3.13%) | 2.97 / 3.13 | 71.25 / 9,420.80 (0.76%) |
| Mobile Performance - Avoid Multiple Page Redirects | 100.00% | 3 (2.34%) | 2.34 / 2.34 | 56.25 / 9,420.80 (0.60%) |
| Mobile Performance - Non-Composited Animations | 100.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 1.56 / 1.56 | 37.50 / 9,420.80 (0.40%) |
| Mobile Performance - Avoid Enormous Network Payloads | 0.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 0.00 / 1.56 | 0.00 / 9,420.80 (0.00%) |
| Mobile Performance - DOM Size | 48.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 0.75 / 1.56 | 18.00 / 9,420.80 (0.19%) |
| Mobile Performance - User Timings | 100.00% | 9 (7.03%) | 7.03 / 7.03 | 168.75 / 9,420.80 (1.79%) |
| Mobile Performance - JavaScript Execution Time | 46.00% | 9 (7.03%) | 3.23 / 7.03 | 77.63 / 9,420.80 (0.82%) |
| Mobile Performance - Minimize Main-Thread Work | 60.00% | 9 (7.03%) | 4.22 / 7.03 | 101.25 / 9,420.80 (1.07%) |
| Mobile Performance - Ensure Text Visible During Webfont Load | 50.00% | 9 (7.03%) | 3.52 / 7.03 | 84.38 / 9,420.80 (0.90%) |
| Mobile Performance - Resources Summary | 30.00% | 9 (7.03%) | 2.11 / 7.03 | 50.63 / 9,420.80 (0.54%) |
| Mobile Performance - Images with Explicit Dimensions | 80.00% | 5 (3.91%) | 3.13 / 3.91 | 75.00 / 9,420.80 (0.80%) |
| Mobile Performance - Remove Duplicate JavaScript | 100.00% | 5 (3.91%) | 3.91 / 3.91 | 93.75 / 9,420.80 (1.00%) |
| Mobile Performance - Avoid Long Tasks | 0.00% | 5 (3.91%) | 0.00 / 3.91 | 0.00 / 9,420.80 (0.00%) |
| Mobile Performance - Use Efficient Cache Lifetimes | 65.00% | 3 (2.34%) | 1.52 / 2.34 | 36.56 / 9,420.80 (0.39%) |
| Mobile Performance - Improve Image Delivery | 15.00% | 3 (2.34%) | 0.35 / 2.34 | 8.44 / 9,420.80 (0.09%) |
| Mobile Performance - Avoid Serving Legacy JavaScript to Modern Browsers | 0.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 0.00 / 1.56 | 0.00 / 9,420.80 (0.00%) |
| Mobile Performance - Avoid Forced Reflow | 15.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 0.23 / 1.56 | 5.63 / 9,420.80 (0.06%) |
| Mobile Performance - Network Dependency Tree | 55.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 0.86 / 1.56 | 20.63 / 9,420.80 (0.22%) |
| Mobile Performance - Optimized Images | 100.00% | 3 (2.34%) | 2.34 / 2.34 | 56.25 / 9,420.80 (0.60%) |
| Mobile Performance - Text Compression | 100.00% | 3 (2.34%) | 2.34 / 2.34 | 56.25 / 9,420.80 (0.60%) |
| Mobile Performance - Preconnect to Required Origins | 100.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 1.56 / 1.56 | 37.50 / 9,420.80 (0.40%) |
| Mobile Performance - Efficient Animated Content | 100.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 1.56 / 1.56 | 37.50 / 9,420.80 (0.40%) |
| Mobile Performance - Preload Key Requests | 100.00% | 2 (1.56%) | 1.56 / 1.56 | 37.50 / 9,420.80 (0.40%) |
| Total Mobile Performance | 65.84 / 106.25 | 1,580.06 / 9,420.80 (16.77%) | ||
Mobile Accessibility Metrics
| Metric | Raw Score | Weight | Score | Overall Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accessibility - Logical Tab Order | 100.00% | 3 (2.52%) | 2.52 / 2.52 | Not weighted |
| Accessibility - Avoid Meta Refresh | 100.00% | 2 (1.68%) | 1.68 / 1.68 | 33.61 / 9,420.80 (0.36%) |
| Accessibility - Use Landmarks | 100.00% | 4 (3.36%) | 3.36 / 3.36 | Not weighted |
| Accessibility - Avoid ARIA Hidden on Body | 100.00% | 2 (1.68%) | 1.68 / 1.68 | 33.61 / 9,420.80 (0.36%) |
| Accessibility - Avoid Focus Traps | 100.00% | 3 (2.52%) | 2.52 / 2.52 | Not weighted |
| Accessibility - ARIA Tooltip Name | 100.00% | 2 (1.68%) | 1.68 / 1.68 | 33.61 / 9,420.80 (0.36%) |
| Accessibility - Valid HTML Language | 100.00% | 5 (4.20%) | 4.20 / 4.20 | 84.03 / 9,420.80 (0.89%) |
| Accessibility - HTML Has Language | 100.00% | 5 (4.20%) | 4.20 / 4.20 | 84.03 / 9,420.80 (0.89%) |
| Accessibility - ARIA Required Parent | 100.00% | 3 (2.52%) | 2.52 / 2.52 | 50.42 / 9,420.80 (0.54%) |
| Accessibility - Focusable Controls | 100.00% | 3 (2.52%) | 2.52 / 2.52 | Not weighted |
| Accessibility - Meta Viewport | 0.00% | 2 (1.68%) | 0.00 / 1.68 | 0.00 / 9,420.80 (0.00%) |
| Accessibility - Avoid Duplicate ARIA IDs | 100.00% | 3 (2.52%) | 2.52 / 2.52 | 50.42 / 9,420.80 (0.54%) |
| Accessibility - Valid ARIA Attributes | 100.00% | 3 (2.52%) | 2.52 / 2.52 | 50.42 / 9,420.80 (0.54%) |
| Accessibility - Access Keys | 100.00% | 2 (1.68%) | 1.68 / 1.68 | 33.61 / 9,420.80 (0.36%) |
| Accessibility - Avoid Multiple Form Labels | 100.00% | 3 (2.52%) | 2.52 / 2.52 | 50.42 / 9,420.80 (0.54%) |
| Accessibility - Valid Language Codes | 100.00% | 5 (4.20%) | 4.20 / 4.20 | 84.03 / 9,420.80 (0.89%) |
| Accessibility - ARIA Hidden Focus | 0.00% | 3 (2.52%) | 0.00 / 2.52 | 0.00 / 9,420.80 (0.00%) |
| Accessibility - ARIA Treeitem Name | 100.00% | 2 (1.68%) | 1.68 / 1.68 | 33.61 / 9,420.80 (0.36%) |
| Accessibility - ARIA Toggle Field Name | 100.00% | 2 (1.68%) | 1.68 / 1.68 | 33.61 / 9,420.80 (0.36%) |
| Accessibility - ARIA Progressbar Name | 100.00% | 2 (1.68%) | 1.68 / 1.68 | 33.61 / 9,420.80 (0.36%) |
| Accessibility - ARIA Required Attributes | 100.00% | 3 (2.52%) | 2.52 / 2.52 | 50.42 / 9,420.80 (0.54%) |
| Accessibility - Interactive Element Affordance | 100.00% | 3 (2.52%) | 2.52 / 2.52 | Not weighted |
| Accessibility - Custom Control Labels | 100.00% | 3 (2.52%) | 2.52 / 2.52 | Not weighted |
| Accessibility - Custom Control Roles | 100.00% | 3 (2.52%) | 2.52 / 2.52 | Not weighted |
| Accessibility - Offscreen Content Hidden | 100.00% | 2 (1.68%) | 1.68 / 1.68 | Not weighted |
| Accessibility - ARIA Command Name | 100.00% | 2 (1.68%) | 1.68 / 1.68 | 33.61 / 9,420.80 (0.36%) |
| Accessibility - ARIA Required Children | 100.00% | 3 (2.52%) | 2.52 / 2.52 | 50.42 / 9,420.80 (0.54%) |
| Accessibility - Table Headers with Data Cells | 100.00% | 2 (1.68%) | 1.68 / 1.68 | 33.61 / 9,420.80 (0.36%) |
| Accessibility - ARIA Input Field Name | 100.00% | 3 (2.52%) | 2.52 / 2.52 | 50.42 / 9,420.80 (0.54%) |
| Accessibility - Tab Index | 100.00% | 3 (2.52%) | 2.52 / 2.52 | 50.42 / 9,420.80 (0.54%) |
| Accessibility - Definition List Item | 100.00% | 2 (1.68%) | 1.68 / 1.68 | 33.61 / 9,420.80 (0.36%) |
| Accessibility - Bypass Blocks | 100.00% | 3 (2.52%) | 2.52 / 2.52 | 50.42 / 9,420.80 (0.54%) |
| Accessibility - ARIA Roles | 100.00% | 3 (2.52%) | 2.52 / 2.52 | 50.42 / 9,420.80 (0.54%) |
| Accessibility - ARIA Meter Name | 100.00% | 2 (1.68%) | 1.68 / 1.68 | 33.61 / 9,420.80 (0.36%) |
| Accessibility - Visual Order Follows DOM | 100.00% | 3 (2.52%) | 2.52 / 2.52 | Not weighted |
| Accessibility - Managed Focus | 100.00% | 3 (2.52%) | 2.52 / 2.52 | Not weighted |
| Accessibility - Input Image Alt Text | 100.00% | 5 (4.20%) | 4.20 / 4.20 | 84.03 / 9,420.80 (0.89%) |
| Accessibility - Link Name | 100.00% | 4 (3.36%) | 3.36 / 3.36 | 67.23 / 9,420.80 (0.71%) |
| Accessibility - Heading Order | 0.00% | 3 (2.52%) | 0.00 / 2.52 | 0.00 / 9,420.80 (0.00%) |
| Accessibility - Button Name | 100.00% | 5 (4.20%) | 4.20 / 4.20 | 84.03 / 9,420.80 (0.89%) |
| Total Mobile Accessibility | 68.07 / 74.79 | 1,361.34 / 9,420.80 (14.45%) | ||
Mobile SEO Metrics
| Metric | Raw Score | Weight | Score | Overall Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile SEO - Hreflang Tags | 100.00% | 6 (8.57%) | 8.57 / 8.57 | 85.71 / 9,420.80 (0.91%) |
| Mobile SEO - Descriptive Link Text | 100.00% | 6 (8.57%) | 8.57 / 8.57 | 85.71 / 9,420.80 (0.91%) |
| Mobile SEO - Canonical Links | 100.00% | 7 (10.00%) | 10.00 / 10.00 | 100.00 / 9,420.80 (1.06%) |
| Mobile SEO - Is Crawlable | 100.00% | 8 (11.43%) | 11.43 / 11.43 | 114.29 / 9,420.80 (1.21%) |
| Mobile SEO - Crawlable Anchors | 100.00% | 6 (8.57%) | 8.57 / 8.57 | 85.71 / 9,420.80 (0.91%) |
| Mobile SEO - HTTP Status Code | 100.00% | 7 (10.00%) | 10.00 / 10.00 | 100.00 / 9,420.80 (1.06%) |
| Mobile SEO - Image Alt Text | 0.00% | 6 (8.57%) | 0.00 / 8.57 | 0.00 / 9,420.80 (0.00%) |
| Mobile SEO - Structured Data | 100.00% | 4 (5.71%) | 5.71 / 5.71 | Not weighted |
| Mobile SEO - Robots.txt | 100.00% | 7 (10.00%) | 10.00 / 10.00 | 100.00 / 9,420.80 (1.06%) |
| Mobile SEO - Document Title | 100.00% | 7 (10.00%) | 10.00 / 10.00 | 100.00 / 9,420.80 (1.06%) |
| Mobile SEO - Meta Description | 0.00% | 6 (8.57%) | 0.00 / 8.57 | 0.00 / 9,420.80 (0.00%) |
| Total Mobile Seo | 77.14 / 94.29 | 771.43 / 9,420.80 (8.19%) | ||
Mobile Best Practices Metrics
| Metric | Raw Score | Weight | Score | Overall Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile Best Practices - HTML Doctype | 100.00% | 6 (12.00%) | 12.00 / 12.00 | 120.00 / 9,420.80 (1.27%) |
| Mobile Best Practices - Detected JavaScript Libraries | 100.00% | 4 (8.00%) | 8.00 / 8.00 | 80.00 / 9,420.80 (0.85%) |
| Mobile Best Practices - Uses HTTPS | 100.00% | 8 (16.00%) | 16.00 / 16.00 | 160.00 / 9,420.80 (1.70%) |
| Mobile Best Practices - Avoid Geolocation on Start | 100.00% | 6 (12.00%) | 12.00 / 12.00 | 120.00 / 9,420.80 (1.27%) |
| Mobile Best Practices - Responsive Image Sizes | 100.00% | 6 (12.00%) | 12.00 / 12.00 | 120.00 / 9,420.80 (1.27%) |
| Mobile Best Practices - Image Aspect Ratio | 100.00% | 6 (12.00%) | 12.00 / 12.00 | 120.00 / 9,420.80 (1.27%) |
| Mobile Best Practices - No Inspector Issues | 100.00% | 7 (14.00%) | 14.00 / 14.00 | 140.00 / 9,420.80 (1.49%) |
| Mobile Best Practices - Avoid Deprecated APIs | 0.00% | 7 (14.00%) | 0.00 / 14.00 | 0.00 / 9,420.80 (0.00%) |
| Total Mobile Best Practices | 86.00 / 100.00 | 860.00 / 9,420.80 (9.13%) | ||
Non-Lighthouse Metrics
| Metric | Raw Score | Weight | Score | Overall Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core - Page Title | 100.00% | 8 (6.35%) | 6.35 / 6.35 | 126.98 / 9,420.80 (1.35%) |
| Core - Meta Description | 0.00% | 7 (5.56%) | 0.00 / 5.56 | 0.00 / 9,420.80 (0.00%) |
| Core - Meta Keywords | 0.00% | 3 (2.38%) | 0.00 / 2.38 | Informational |
| Core - Keywords - One Word | 86.50% | 4 (3.17%) | 2.75 / 3.17 | 54.92 / 9,420.80 (0.58%) |
| Core - Keywords - Two Words | 85.00% | 5 (3.97%) | 3.37 / 3.97 | 67.46 / 9,420.80 (0.72%) |
| Core - Keywords - Three Words | 85.00% | 5 (3.97%) | 3.37 / 3.97 | 67.46 / 9,420.80 (0.72%) |
| Core - Keywords - Four Words | 85.00% | 4 (3.17%) | 2.70 / 3.17 | 53.97 / 9,420.80 (0.57%) |
| Core - Meta Keyword-to-Content Alignment | — | 6 (4.76%) | — | No data |
| Core - Text To Html Ratio | 50.70% | 5 (3.97%) | 2.01 / 3.97 | 40.24 / 9,420.80 (0.43%) |
| Core - HTML Headings | 39.00% | 6 (4.76%) | 1.86 / 4.76 | 37.14 / 9,420.80 (0.39%) |
| Core - Sitemap | 100.00% | 5 (3.97%) | 3.97 / 3.97 | 79.37 / 9,420.80 (0.84%) |
| Core - Internal vs External Links | 70.00% | 5 (3.97%) | 2.78 / 3.97 | 55.56 / 9,420.80 (0.59%) |
| Core - NoIndex, NoFollow, DoFollow Links | 100.00% | 4 (3.17%) | 3.17 / 3.17 | 63.49 / 9,420.80 (0.67%) |
| Core - SEO Friendly Links | 50.00% | 5 (3.97%) | 1.98 / 3.97 | 39.68 / 9,420.80 (0.42%) |
| Core - Favicon | 100.00% | 3 (2.38%) | 2.38 / 2.38 | 47.62 / 9,420.80 (0.51%) |
| Core - Image Alt Test | 25.00% | 6 (4.76%) | 1.19 / 4.76 | 23.81 / 9,420.80 (0.25%) |
| Core - DOC Type | 100.00% | 4 (3.17%) | 3.17 / 3.17 | 63.49 / 9,420.80 (0.67%) |
| Core - Deprecated HTML Tag | 100.00% | 5 (3.97%) | 3.97 / 3.97 | 79.37 / 9,420.80 (0.84%) |
| Core - HTML Page Size | 100.00% | 5 (3.97%) | 3.97 / 3.97 | 79.37 / 9,420.80 (0.84%) |
| Core - GZIP Compression | 0.00% | 6 (4.76%) | 0.00 / 4.76 | 0.00 / 9,420.80 (0.00%) |
| Core - Inline CSS | 15.00% | 4 (3.17%) | 0.48 / 3.17 | 9.52 / 9,420.80 (0.10%) |
| Core - Internal CSS | 45.00% | 4 (3.17%) | 1.43 / 3.17 | 28.57 / 9,420.80 (0.30%) |
| Core - Structured Data | 0.00% | 5 (3.97%) | 0.00 / 3.97 | 0.00 / 9,420.80 (0.00%) |
| Core - IP Canonicalization | 100.00% | 4 (3.17%) | 3.17 / 3.17 | 63.49 / 9,420.80 (0.67%) |
| Core - URL Canonicalization Test | 100.00% | 5 (3.97%) | 3.97 / 3.97 | 79.37 / 9,420.80 (0.84%) |
| Core - Plain Text Email Test | 100.00% | 3 (2.38%) | 2.38 / 2.38 | 47.62 / 9,420.80 (0.51%) |
| Total Non-Lighthouse Metrics | 60.42 / 92.86 | 1,208.49 / 9,420.80 (12.83%) | ||
Overall Categories Summary
| Category | Score (%) | Awarded Points | Weight | Weighted Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desktop Performance | 65.55% | 64.53 / 98.44 | 16% | 1,032.43 / 9,420.80 (10.96%) |
| Mobile Accessibility | 91.01% | 68.07 / 74.79 | 20% | 1,361.34 / 9,420.80 (14.45%) |
| Mobile Best Practices | 86.00% | 86.00 / 100.00 | 10% | 860.00 / 9,420.80 (9.13%) |
| Mobile Performance | 61.96% | 65.84 / 106.25 | 24% | 1,580.06 / 9,420.80 (16.77%) |
| Mobile Seo | 81.82% | 77.14 / 94.29 | 10% | 771.43 / 9,420.80 (8.19%) |
| Non-Lighthouse Metrics | 65.07% | 60.42 / 92.86 | 20% | 1,208.49 / 9,420.80 (12.83%) |
Overall Total Points Awarded: 6,813.75
Overall Total Points Available: 9,420.80
Overall Percentage: 72.33%
What Does "Liquid Purple" mean?
noun | / LIK-wid PUR-pul /
-
(biochemistry) Also known as visual purple or rhodopsin — a light-sensitive receptor protein found in the rods of the retina. It enables vision in dim light by transforming invisible darkness into visible form. Derived from the Greek rhódon (rose) and ópsis (sight), its name reflects its delicate pink hue and vital role in perception.
-
(modern usage) Liquid Purple — a website management agency specializing in uncovering unseen opportunities and illuminating brands hidden in the digital dark. Much like its biological namesake, Liquid Purple transforms faint signals into clear visibility — revealing what others overlook and bringing businesses into the light.
Origin: From the scientific term rhodopsin, discovered by Franz Christian Boll in 1876; adopted metaphorically by a web development firm dedicated to visual clarity in the age of algorithms.