SEO Report Page

Report Generated: November 19, 2025 at 02:35

Region: California, United States

Audit Engine: Unknown

Key Metrics

Overall Score

C (78.63%)

0.13s

Time

1.8MB

Weight

483

Requests

0.13s

Clock

1.8MB

Weight

486

Requests

Visual Progress

No filmstrip data available

Page Composition

Page Weight

Total: 1.8 MB

Other

JavaScript 1 MB

Other 477.4 KB

HTML 143.6 KB

Images 123 KB

Fonts 73.6 KB

CSS Stylesheets 0B

Media 0B

Request Count

Total: 163 requests

Other

IMG

JavaScript 89 req

Other 53 req

Images 15 req

Fonts 4 req

HTML 2 req

CSS Stylesheets 0 req

Media 0 req

Performance Metrics

Show Details

First Contentful Paint

Poor

2.08s

First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted onto your page.

Mobile: 2.7 s Desktop: 0.6 s Score: 65%

Learn More →

Time to Interactive

Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive.

Mobile: Desktop: Score: 0%

Learn More →

Speed Index

Needs Improvement

2.08s

Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated.

Mobile: 2.7 s Desktop: 0.6 s Score: 76%

Learn More →

Total Blocking Time

Excellent

40ms

How much time is blocked by scripts during your page loading process.

Mobile: 60 ms Desktop: 0 ms Score: 100%

Learn More →

Largest Contentful Paint

Poor

3.07s

Largest Contentful Paint marks how long it takes for the largest element of content to be painted on your page.

Mobile: 4.0 s Desktop: 0.9 s Score: 31%

Learn More →

Cumulative Layout Shift

Excellent

0.004

Cumulative Layout Shift measures the movement of visible elements within the viewport as the page loads.

Mobile: 0 Desktop: 0.012 Score: 100%

Learn More →

Response Codes

Summary

55.6%

Core

70.7%

Performance

100.0%

SEO

100.0%

Accessibility

100.0%

Best Practice

Show Details

Time to Interactive

Critical

Metric Score: 0%

Time to Interactive is slow; consider reducing JavaScript execution.

TTI Value	Interpretation	Status
≤ 3.8 s	Good (100)	Good
3.8 s - 7.3 s	Needs Improvement (declines from 100 to 0)	Warning
≥ 7.3 s	Poor (0)	Critical

This card uses weighted scoring (70% mobile, 30% desktop).

Title is the heading of the webpage. The sentence or string enclosed between html title tag (<title></title>) is the title of your website. Search engines searches for the title of your website and displays title along with your website address on search result. Title is the most important element for both SEO and social sharing. Title should be less than 50 to 60 characters because search engine typically displays this length of string or sentence on search result. A good title can consist the primary keyword, secondary keyword and brand name. For example a fictitious gaming information providing sites title may be like "the future of gaming information is here". A webpage title should contain a proper glimpse of the website. title is important element as an identification of your website for user experience, SEO and social sharing. So have a nice and catching title.

You have a page title but it’s too long and exceeds 70 characters. Shorten it.

Title: Angelese Russell Master Life Coach and Fitness Specialist | Fitness Specialist
Length: 79

Meta Description

Critical

Metric Score: 50%

Description is the full interpretation of your website content and features. Most often it is a short paragraph that describe what are features and information provided by the website to its visitors. You may consider it a advertising of your website. Although not important for search engine ranking but very important for hits or visits through search engine results. Description should be less than 150 character because search engine shows this length of paragraph on search result. And every page of website should contain an unique description to avoid description duplication. Description is the definition of your website for user experience so form it as complete but short and precise illustration of your website.

Your meta description exceeds 150 characters. It's not good.

Description: Certified Master Life & Fitness Coach based in Dana Point Angelese Russell brings over 35 years of expertise as a personal coach empowering individuals to transcend physical & emotional barriers. What sets her apart is her unwavering commitment to guiding clients toward their ultimate potential. Core Services: Angelese offers personalized coaching sessions, whether on location or remotely, her holistic approach encompasses both physical & emotional well-being for longevity. angeleserussell.com
Length: 499

Meta Keywords

Critical

Metric Score: 0%

Meta keywords are keywords inside Meta tags. Meta keywords are not likely to be used for search engine ranking. the words of title and description can be used as meta keywords. it is a good idea for SEO other than search engine ranking.

Your site does not have any meta keywords.

Keywords:
Length: 0

Keyword Usage

Critical

Metric Score: 0%

Keyword usage is the using of your keywords inside Meta tags and contents of your website. Use keywords that describes your site properly for precise search engine result of your website.

Needs improvement. Few or no meta keywords match your content.

Meta Keyword	In Content

Text/HTML Ratio Test

Critical

Measured Value: 0.6%

Metric Score: 6%

Text-to-HTML ratio measures visible text content as a percentage of total HTML markup. Modern CMS and framework-heavy sites (Joomla, WordPress, React, etc.) typically produce 5–15% due to component scaffolding, utility CSS classes, and inline SVGs. A ratio above 15% is excellent. While not a direct ranking factor, a low ratio signals DOM bloat, inline code, and excessive markup that affects Core Web Vitals, crawl efficiency, and overall page weight.

Your text-to-HTML ratio is 0.6% — very low. The page is extremely code-heavy relative to visible content. Review for DOM bloat, inline resources, and unnecessary markup.

HTML Headings

Needs Work

Metric Score: 73%

H1 status is the existence of any content inside h1 tag. Although not important like Meta titles and descriptions for search engine ranking but still a good way to describe your contents in search engine result. H2 status is less important but should be used for proper understanding of your website for visitor.

Issues found: Duplicate headings found. Ensure all headings are unique., Some headings exceed 80 characters. Shorten them for better SEO.

H1(1)

Reviews

H2(6)

Dana Point, CA
(808) 989-4095
" Her unique approach, marrying life coaching with physical awareness, created a transformative experience along with her intuitive understanding have been instrumental in my journey toward holistic well-being" N. Mazzanti
(808) 989-4095
“Transformation lives in the space between who you were and who you are becoming ” 
Contact Me

H3(1)

(808) 989-4095

H4(0)

H5(0)

H6(1)

Let's start the conversation that opens the door to your next chapter

Heading Order

Critical

Metric Score: 40%

Heading levels should not be skipped. For example, do not jump from h1 to h3 without an h2 in between. Proper heading hierarchy helps screen readers navigate page content and improves accessibility compliance. This is a WCAG 2.1 Level A guideline.

Heading order issues: Heading level skips from h3 to h6 (missing h4, h5).

Heading Order: 40%
Heading Levels Used: h1, h2, h3, h6
Level Skips: 2
Issues:

Heading level skips from h3 to h6 (missing h4, h5).

Button Name

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Every interactive button must have an accessible name so assistive technologies can announce its purpose. Add inner text content, aria-label, aria-labelledby, or a title attribute to all <button>, <input type="button|submit|reset">, and role="button" elements. This is a WCAG 2.1 Level A requirement.

No buttons found on the page.

Button Name: 100%
Total Buttons: 0
Without Accessible Name: 0

Sitemap

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Sitemap is a xml file which contain full list of your website urls. It is used to include directories of your websites for crawling and indexing for search engine and access for users. It can help search engine robots for indexing your website more fast and deeply. It is roughly an opposite of robots.txt. You can create a sitemap.xml by various free and paid services or you can write it with proper formatting. Also keep these things in mind: 1) Sitemap must be less than 10 MB (10,485,760 bytes) and can contain maximum 50,000 urls. If you have more urls than this, create multiple sitemap files and use a sitemap index file. 2) Put your sitemap in the website root directory and add the url of your sitemap in robots.txt. 3) sitemap.xml can be compressed using gzip for faster loading.

Your site has a sitemap.

Location: https://www.angeleserussell.com/sitemap.xml

Internal vs External Links

Needs Work

Metric Score: 75%

Internal links connect pages within your website, improving navigation and SEO. External links point to other websites and should be used sparingly to high-quality sources. A good balance (more internal than external) enhances user experience and search engine ranking.

Good number of internal links. Too many external links. Reduce to avoid SEO penalties. More internal links than external links is preferred.

Total Internal Links10

https://www.angeleserussell.com
https://www.angeleserussell.com/about-me
https://www.angeleserussell.com
https://www.angeleserussell.com/life-coaching
https://www.angeleserussell.com/home-gym-design-personal-training
https://www.angeleserussell.com/blog
https://www.angeleserussell.com/services-4
https://www.angeleserussell.com/reviews
https://www.angeleserussell.com
https://www.angeleserussell.com/services-4

Total External Links13

https://calendly.com/angeleserussell
https://www.instagram.com/angeleserussell/
https://www.facebook.com/angeleserussell
https://www.linkedin.com/in/angelese-russell-28088821a/
./#comp-ltq18a3s
./#comp-ltq14hvt1
./#comp-ltq14hvz
./#comp-lts1y3sj
./#comp-luhn2kj6
./#comp-m3wj066c
mailto:
https://calendly.com/angeleserussell
https://needitwrite.com/

NoIndex, NoFollow, DoFollow Links

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

NoIndex prevents search engines from indexing a page, while NoFollow prevents passing link equity. DoFollow links allow both. Minimize NoIndex and NoFollow unless intentional, and ensure DoFollow links dominate for SEO. Use meta robots tags carefully to control crawling behavior.

No NoIndex links found, which is good for SEO. Good balance of NoFollow and DoFollow links. No restrictive meta robots settings, allowing crawling. Links detected, supporting site navigation.

Scoring breakdown for NoIndex, NoFollow, DoFollow links
Component	Your Value	Score
NoIndex Links (30 pts max)	0 links	30 / 30
DoFollow vs NoFollow (30 pts max)	23 DoFollow · 0 NoFollow	30 / 30
Meta Robots (20 pts max)	No restrictions	20 / 20
Link Presence (20 pts max)	23 total links	20 / 20
Total		100 / 100

≥ 80 = Excellent • 60–79 = Warning • < 60 = Critical

SEO Friendly Links

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

An SEO friendly link follows these rules: use dashes as separators, avoid parameters and numbers, and use static URLs. To optimize: 1) Replace underscores or other separators with dashes, remove numbers and parameters. 2) Merge www and non-www URLs. 3) Use static URLs and create an XML sitemap. 4) Block unfriendly links via robots.txt. 5) Use canonical tags.

Links of your site are SEO friendly.

Favicon

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

A favicon is a small icon displayed in browser tabs and bookmarks, enhancing brand recognition and user experience. Ensure your site has a favicon for better SEO and professionalism.

Your site has a favicon.

Favicon URL: https://static.wixstatic.com/media/f1acda_47f12a0dd6494e4e8b7109180a9f50d1%7Emv2.jpeg/v1/fill/w_180%2Ch_180%2Clg_1%2Cusm_0.66_1.00_0.01/f1acda_47f12a0dd6494e4e8b7109180a9f50d1%7Emv2.jpeg

Image Alt Test

Critical

Metric Score: 50%

An alternate title for images (alt attribute) describes the image content, aiding search engine spiders and accessibility. Ensure all content images have descriptive alt text, excluding decorative images.

Your site has 1 images without alt text.

Images Without Alt Text (1)

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/f1acda_5d22685b6cf24edca96747baddb68d3c~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_425,h_179,al_c,q_85,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_avif,quality_auto/f1acda_5d22685b6cf24edca96747baddb68d3c~mv2.png

Document has a valid `hreflang`

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Use hreflang tags to specify language and regional targeting for international pages.

Document has a valid `hreflang`

Links have descriptive text

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Use descriptive link text instead of generic phrases like "click here" or "learn more."

Links have descriptive text

Page isn’t blocked from indexing

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Ensure pages are not blocked from crawling by robots.txt or meta robots tags.

Page isn’t blocked from indexing

Links are crawlable

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Ensure anchor elements have href attributes so search engines can discover linked pages.

Links are crawlable

Page has successful HTTP status code

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Pages should return a successful HTTP status code (200) to be indexed.

Page has successful HTTP status code

Image elements have `[alt]` attributes

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Provide descriptive alt text for all content images to aid search engines and accessibility.

Image elements have `[alt]` attributes

Structured data is valid

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Use structured data (Schema.org) to enhance search engine understanding and rich results.

Manual verification required

robots.txt is valid

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Ensure a valid robots.txt file exists to guide search engine crawlers.

robots.txt is valid

DOC Type

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

A doctype declaration validates your web page and ensures proper rendering. It is not a direct SEO factor but is essential for web standards compliance. Add a doctype (e.g., <!DOCTYPE html>) to your HTML.

Page has a valid doctype.

Doctype: <!DOCTYPE html>

Deprecated HTML Tag

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Deprecated HTML tags and attributes (e.g., <font>, <center>) are outdated and may not be supported in future browsers. Replace them with modern HTML and CSS for better compatibility and maintainability.

Your site does not have any deprecated HTML tags.

HTML Page Size

Critical

Metric Score: 25%

HTML page size impacts webpage loading time and should generally stay under 100 KB (excluding external CSS, JS, or images). To optimize: 1) Move CSS and JS to external files. 2) Prioritize text content for faster rendering. 3) Compress images and media to under 100 KB.

HTML page size is 743 KB, which is significantly large. Reduce below 400 KB.

Your HTML page size: 743.2 KB

HTML Size	Interpretation	Status
≤ 100 KB	Excellent (100)	Excellent
100 KB - 200 KB	Good (75)	Good
200 KB - 400 KB	Needs Improvement (50)	Warning
> 400 KB	Poor (25)	Poor

Current status: Poor. Keep HTML as lean as possible for faster delivery and rendering.

Micro Data Schema Test

Critical

Metric Score: 25%

Microdata provides structured information about your content, improving search engine understanding and display in search results. Use schema.org markup to enhance visibility.

Site failed micro data schema test.

IP Canonicalization Test

Critical

Metric Score: 0%

IP canonicalization ensures search engines don't treat multiple domains on the same IP as duplicates. Use redirects to point to your primary domain for proper indexing.

Site failed IP canonicalization test.

URL Canonicalization Test

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Canonical tags consolidate duplicate URLs into a single preferred version, preventing content duplication issues. Use <link rel="canonical"> for consistent indexing.

Site passed URL canonicalization test.

Plain Text Email Test

Critical

Metric Score: 0%

Plain text email addresses are vulnerable to scraping by bots, leading to spam. Obfuscate emails using CSS pseudo classes, reverse writing, or JavaScript.

Site failed plain text email test with 113 plain text emails found.

Plain Text Email List (113)

segmenter@11.7.10
bundle@3.2.1
polyfill@5.0.9
lodash@4.17.21
react@18.3.1
dom@18.3.1

First Contentful Paint

Poor

Metric Score: 65%

First Contentful Paint measures the time until the first content is rendered on mobile.

Your page render time needs improvement. Desktop: 0.61s (Good). Mobile: 2.71s (Poor).

FCP Value	Interpretation	Status
≤ 1.0 s	Excellent (100)	Excellent
1.0 s - 1.8 s	Good (declines from 100 to 80)	Good
1.8 s - 3.0 s	Needs Improvement (declines from 80 to 40)	Warning
3.0 s - 6.0 s	Poor (declines from 40 to 0)	Critical
> 6.0 s	Very Poor (0)	Critical

This card uses weighted scoring (70% mobile, 30% desktop).

Speed Index

Needs Work

Metric Score: 76%

Speed Index shows how quickly content is visually displayed on mobile.

Your page visually loads in 2.71 seconds on mobile. Consider optimizing to reduce load time.

Speed Index	Interpretation	Status
≤ 1.5 s	Excellent (100)	Excellent
1.5 s - 2.0 s	Good (declines from 100 to 80)	Good
2.0 s - 4.0 s	Needs Improvement (declines from 80 to 40)	Warning
> 4.0 s	Poor (falls toward 0)	Critical

This card uses weighted scoring (70% mobile, 30% desktop).

Total Blocking Time

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Total Blocking Time measures the total duration of long tasks (over 50 ms) that block the main thread during page load. High TBT means the page may feel unresponsive to user input. Optimize JavaScript execution, break up long tasks, and defer non-critical scripts to reduce blocking time.

Your site has 56 milliseconds of blocking time on mobile. This is optimal.

TBT Value	Interpretation	Status
≤ 150 ms	Excellent (100)	Excellent
150 ms - 300 ms	Good (declines from 100 to 80)	Good
300 ms - 600 ms	Needs Improvement (declines from 80 to 40)	Warning
600 ms - 1200 ms	Poor (declines from 40 to 0)	Critical
> 1200 ms	Very Poor (0)	Critical

This card uses weighted scoring (70% mobile, 30% desktop).

Largest Contentful Paint

Critical

Metric Score: 31%

Largest Contentful Paint measures how long it takes for the largest visible content element (image, video, or text block) to render. Optimize images, improve server response times, and eliminate render-blocking resources to reduce LCP.

Your Largest Contentful Paint is poor and should be optimized. Desktop: 914 ms (Good). Mobile: 3991 ms (Poor).

LCP Value	Interpretation	Status
≤ 1.2 s	Excellent (100)	Excellent
1.2 s - 2.5 s	Good (100)	Good
2.5 s - 4.0 s	Needs Improvement (declines from 100 to 0)	Warning
> 4.0 s	Poor (0)	Critical

This card uses desktop/mobile weighted scoring (70% mobile, 30% desktop).

Cumulative Layout Shift

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Cumulative Layout Shift measures the total of all unexpected layout shifts that occur during the page lifespan. Set explicit dimensions on images and videos, avoid inserting content above existing content, and use CSS containment to minimize layout instability.

Your page has a CLS score of 0 on mobile. This is optimal.

CLS Value	Interpretation	Status
≤ 0.05	Excellent (100)	Excellent
0.05 - 0.10	Good (declines from 100 to 80)	Good
0.10 - 0.25	Needs Improvement (declines from 80 to 40)	Warning
0.25 - 0.50	Poor (declines from 40 to 0)	Critical
> 0.50	Very Poor (0)	Critical

This card uses weighted scoring (70% mobile, 30% desktop).

Render Blocking Requests

Critical

Metric Score: 0%

Render-blocking resources (scripts, stylesheets) delay the first paint of your page. Eliminate them by delivering critical JS/CSS inline, deferring non-critical scripts, and avoiding @import in CSS.

No render-blocking data captured for this report. Please re-run the audit to populate this metric.

Savings Potential: N/A (Mobile), N/A (Desktop)

Avoid Chaining Critical Requests

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Critical request chains represent resources that depend on each other to load. Reducing the length and size of these chains can speed up page loading. Use link rel=preload to load critical assets sooner.

No critical request chains detected. This is optimal.

Initial Server Response Time

Excellent

Metric Score: 98%

Server response time (TTFB) measures how long it takes for a browser to receive the first byte of page content. Optimize backend performance to improve this.

Your server responds in 22 milliseconds on mobile. This is optimal.

Unminified CSS

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Minifying CSS files can reduce network payload sizes.

Your page has 0 unminified CSS files on mobile. This is optimal.

Unminified CSS Files: 0 (Mobile), 0 (Desktop)

Unminified JavaScript

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time.

Your page has Mobile: 0, Desktop: 0 unminified JavaScript files. This is optimal.

Unminified JavaScript Files: 0 files (Mobile), 0 files (Desktop)

Unminified JavaScript Files: No unminified JavaScript detected

Unused CSS Rules

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Unused CSS rules add unnecessary bytes to your page, slowing download and parse times. Identify and remove CSS that is not used on the page, or defer non-critical CSS to improve load performance.

Your page has 0 unused CSS files on mobile. This is optimal.

Unused CSS Files: N/A (Mobile), N/A (Desktop)

Unused CSS Files: No unused CSS files detected

Unused JavaScript

Needs Work

Metric Score: 75%

Unused JavaScript increases download size and parse/compile time, delaying interactivity. Remove unused code, use code splitting, and defer non-critical scripts to reduce the JavaScript payload.

Your page has 5 unused JavaScript files on mobile. Consider removing or deferring unused code.

Unused JavaScript Files: Est savings of 184 KiB (Mobile), Est savings of 184 KiB (Desktop)

Top Unused JavaScript Files:

#	URL	Total Size	Potential Savings	Savings %
1	www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=AW-17283654291&cx=c&gtm=4e5bh1	116.92 KB	45.76 KB	39.14%
2	www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=AW-17283654291&cx=c&gtm=4e5bh1h1	116.88 KB	45.75 KB	39.14%
3	www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js	72.12 KB	42.92 KB	59.51%
4	static.parastorage.com/services/wix-thunderbolt/dist/main.9350fa55.bundle.min.js	79.33 KB	40.88 KB	51.53%
5	static.parastorage.com/services/wix-thunderbolt/dist/group_6.043def33.chunk.min.js	55.31 KB	34.21 KB	61.84%

Uses Optimized Images

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Serve images in modern formats (WebP, AVIF), compress them appropriately, and deliver correctly sized images for each viewport. Unoptimized images are often the single largest source of page weight, directly increasing load time and data usage. Use responsive images with srcset, lazy-load offscreen images, and apply lossy or lossless compression to reduce file size without visible quality loss.

No unoptimized images detected. This is optimal.

Unoptimized Images: N/A (Mobile), N/A (Desktop)

Unoptimized Images: No unoptimized images detected

Uses Text Compression

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Enable text-based resource compression (Gzip or Brotli) on your server for HTML, CSS, JavaScript, SVG, and JSON responses. Compression typically reduces transfer size by 60–80%, significantly improving load time. Configure your web server or CDN to compress all text-based MIME types and verify with response headers (Content-Encoding: gzip or br).

No uncompressed text resources detected. This is optimal.

Uncompressed Text Resources: N/A (Mobile), N/A (Desktop)

Uncompressed Resources: No uncompressed text resources detected

Uses Rel Preconnect

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Use <link rel="preconnect"> to establish early connections to important third-party origins, saving DNS lookup, TCP handshake, and TLS negotiation time. This is especially valuable for fonts, analytics, CDN assets, and API endpoints loaded early in the page lifecycle. Limit preconnects to 2–4 critical origins to avoid connection contention.

No missing preconnect opportunities detected. This is optimal.

Missing Preconnect Origins: N/A (Mobile), N/A (Desktop)

Missing Preconnect Origins: No missing preconnect opportunities detected

Server Response Time

Excellent

Metric Score: 98%

Initial Server Response Time (Time to First Byte) measures how long the server takes to respond to the first request. Optimize server-side processing, use caching, upgrade hosting infrastructure, and minimize redirects to reduce TTFB.

Your server responds in 22 milliseconds on mobile. This is optimal.

Redirects

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Page redirects add extra network round trips before content can be loaded, increasing latency. Eliminate unnecessary redirects, update internal links to point directly to final URLs, and ensure HTTPS redirects are minimal.

Your page has 0 redirects on mobile. This is optimal.

Redirects: N/A (Mobile), N/A (Desktop)

Redirects: No redirects detected

Efficient Animated Content

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Replace large GIF animations with video formats (MP4, WebM) which are significantly smaller and can be hardware-decoded. Animated GIFs are extremely inefficient — a 10-second GIF can easily exceed 10 MB while the equivalent MP4 may be under 500 KB. Use <video autoplay loop muted playsinline> as a drop-in replacement, and consider CSS animations or Lottie for UI animations.

No inefficient animated content detected. This is optimal.

Inefficient Animated Content: N/A (Mobile), N/A (Desktop)

Inefficient Animated Content: No inefficient animated content detected

Non-Composited Animations

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Non-composited animations run on the main thread instead of the GPU, causing jank and poor visual performance. Use CSS properties like transform and opacity for animations, which can be GPU-accelerated and run on the compositor thread.

Your page has 0 non-composited animations on mobile. This is optimal.

Non-Composited Animations: N/A (Mobile), N/A (Desktop)

Non-Composited Animations: No non-composited animations detected

Total Byte Weight

Critical

Measured Value: 5% (1,860 KiB)

Metric Score: 5%

Total Byte Weight measures the total size of all resources loaded by the page. Reduce resource sizes for better performance.

Your page has a total byte weight of 1855.43 KB on mobile. Reduce resource sizes urgently.

Total Size	Score Interpretation	Status
≤ 400 KB	Excellent (80-100)	Good
400 KB - 800 KB	Needs Improvement (60-79)	Warning
> 800 KB	Poor (< 60)	Critical

Score = 100 - (Bytes / 20,000). A lighter page loads faster.

DOM Size

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Reduce DOM node count to speed up page rendering.

No DOM size data available.

DOM Size: N/A (Mobile), N/A (Desktop)

DOM Statistics: No DOM size statistics available

User Timings

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Use User Timing API marks/measures to understand performance bottlenecks.

User timings are informative. Review timings to optimize key page events.

User Timings: 311 user timings (Mobile), N/A (Desktop)

User Timings (Top 5):

Create Platform Web Worker: 0.72 ms
overrideGlobals started: 125.51 ms (Marker)
overrideGlobals ended: 126.96 ms (Marker)
[cache] hit,hit_hit [fastly_g]: 167.14 ms (Marker)
platform_create-worker started: 321.27 ms (Marker)

Bootup Time

Needs Work

Metric Score: 72%

Reduce JavaScript execution time to improve responsiveness.

Your page has a JavaScript execution time of 562.7 ms on mobile. Consider optimizing scripts.

Bootup Time: 0.6 s (Mobile), N/A (Desktop)

Scripts with High Execution Time (Top 5):

Unattributable: 376.50 ms
/: 252.81 ms
/gtag/js: 104.97 ms
/unpkg/react@18.3.1/umd/react.production.min.js: 99.64 ms
/unpkg/lodash@4.17.21/lodash.min.js: 51.42 ms

Mainthread Work Breakdown

Good

Metric Score: 82%

Reduce main-thread tasks to improve responsiveness.

Your page has a main thread work time of 1433.45 ms on mobile. This is optimal.

Mainthread Work Breakdown: 1.4 s (Mobile), N/A (Desktop)

Main Thread Tasks (Top 5 by Duration):

Script Evaluation: 795.54 ms
Script Parsing & Compilation: 227.26 ms
Other: 197.95 ms
Style & Layout: 135.53 ms
Parse HTML & CSS: 32.88 ms

Font Display

Critical

Metric Score: 0%

Ensure text remains visible during webfont loading.

Lighthouse report did not include the font-display audit. Cannot evaluate this factor.

Font Display: Font-display audit missing (Mobile), No Lighthouse data (Desktop)

Fonts Without Font-Display: No fonts without font-display detected

Resource Summary

Critical

Metric Score: 42%

Minimize the number of requests and total transfer size to improve page load performance. Fewer requests and smaller transfer sizes reduce latency and improve user experience, especially on mobile devices.

Reduce requests to under 50 (current: 164). Combine CSS/JS files and optimize images. Transfer size (1,866.90 KB) is acceptable but could be reduced. Optimize images.

Total Resources: 164 requests • 1,855.43 KB (Mobile), 163 requests • 1,866.90 KB (Desktop)
Desktop Resources:

Other: 53 requests, 477.37 KB
Document: 2 requests, 143.60 KB
Image: 15 requests, 123.04 KB
Font: 4 requests, 73.62 KB
Script: 89 requests, 1,049.26 KB

Mobile Resources:

Other: 55 requests, 461.25 KB
Document: 2 requests, 155.82 KB
Image: 13 requests, 90.52 KB
Font: 4 requests, 73.62 KB
Script: 90 requests, 1,074.23 KB

No Document Write

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

No Document Write checks for document.write() calls, which can delay page rendering. Avoid using document.write() for better performance.

No document.write() calls detected. This is optimal.

No Document Write: N/A
Document Write Instances: No document.write() calls detected

Unsized Images

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Unsized Images checks for images without explicit width and height, which can cause layout shifts. Set dimensions to improve performance.

No unsized images detected. This is optimal.

Unsized Images: N/A
Unsized Images: No unsized images detected

Uses Rel Preload

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Use <link rel="preload"> to prioritize fetching critical resources that are discovered late in the page load (e.g., fonts referenced in CSS, hero images, key scripts). Preloading tells the browser to start downloading these resources immediately rather than waiting until they are naturally discovered during parsing. Limit preloads to 3–5 truly critical resources to avoid bandwidth contention.

No resources identified for preload. This is optimal.

Uses Rel Preload: N/A
Resources to Preload: No resources identified for preload

Duplicated JavaScript

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Remove duplicate JavaScript modules to reduce bundle size and parse/compile time. Use code splitting and tree shaking to eliminate redundant code.

No duplicated JavaScript detected. This is optimal.

Duplicated JavaScript: N/A
Duplicated Scripts: No duplicated JavaScript detected

Long Tasks

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Long tasks (>50ms) block the main thread and delay responsiveness. Break up long-running JavaScript into smaller chunks using techniques like code splitting, web workers, or yielding to the browser.

No long tasks detected. This is optimal.

Overall Score

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Overall accessibility score based on Lighthouse audit metrics.

Score: 100%. No issues found.

Accessibility - Overall Score: 100% (No issues found)
Raw Score: 100%
Accessibility Issues: No accessibility issues detected

Logical Tab Order

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Ensure elements follow a logical tab order for keyboard navigation on mobile.

Ensure elements follow a logical tab order for keyboard navigation on mobile. Requires manual review.

Logical Tab Order: N/A
Raw Score: N/A
Tab Order Issues: No tab order issues detected

Avoid Meta Refresh

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Avoid using meta refresh to prevent accessibility issues on mobile. <strong><a class="text-danger" target="_BLANK" href="https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.10/meta-refresh">Learn More</a></strong>

Avoid using meta refresh to prevent accessibility issues on mobile. Audit data is missing.

Meta Refresh: N/A
Raw Score: N/A
Meta Refresh Issues: No meta refresh issues detected

Use Landmarks

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Use ARIA landmarks to improve navigation for screen readers on mobile.

Use ARIA landmarks to improve navigation for screen readers on mobile. Audit data is missing.

Use Landmarks: N/A
Raw Score: N/A
Landmark Issues: No landmark issues detected

Avoid ARIA Hidden on Body

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Avoid using aria-hidden on the body element on mobile. <strong><a class="text-danger" target="_BLANK" href="https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.10/aria-hidden-body">Learn More</a></strong>

Avoid using aria-hidden on the body element on mobile. Audit data is missing.

ARIA Hidden Body: N/A
Raw Score: N/A
ARIA Hidden Body Issues: No ARIA hidden body issues detected

Avoid Focus Traps

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Ensure focus is not trapped in elements on mobile.

Ensure focus is not trapped in elements on mobile. Audit data is missing.

Focus Traps: N/A
Raw Score: N/A
Focus Trap Issues: No focus trap issues detected

Valid HTML Language

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Ensure HTML has a valid language code for accessibility.

Ensure the HTML lang attribute has a valid value on mobile. Audit data is missing.

Valid HTML Language: N/A
Raw Score: N/A
Valid HTML Language Issues: No invalid language code issues detected

HTML Has Language

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Include a lang attribute on the HTML element for mobile. Audit data is missing.

HTML Has Language: N/A
Raw Score: N/A
HTML Language Issues: No missing language attribute issues detected

ARIA Required Parent

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Ensure ARIA roles have required parent elements on mobile. Audit data is missing.

ARIA Required Parent: N/A
Raw Score: N/A
ARIA Required Parent Issues: No missing parent role issues detected

Focusable Controls

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Ensure controls are focusable for touch and keyboard navigation. Audit data is missing.

Focusable Controls: N/A
Raw Score: N/A
Focusable Controls Issues: No focusable control issues detected

Meta Viewport

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

A valid viewport meta tag is required for mobile accessibility and responsive rendering. Use <code><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"></code>, and avoid settings that disable zoom (for example, <code>maximum-scale</code> or <code>user-scalable=no</code>).

Viewport settings look valid for mobile accessibility.

Meta Viewport: 0 viewport issue found
Raw Score: 100%
Meta Viewport Issues: No viewport issues detected

Avoid Duplicate ARIA IDs

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Avoid duplicate ARIA IDs to ensure screen readers work correctly on mobile. <strong><a class="text-danger" target="_BLANK" href="https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.10/duplicate-id-aria">Learn More</a></strong>

Avoid duplicate ARIA IDs for mobile accessibility. Audit data is missing.

Duplicate ARIA IDs: N/A
Raw Score: N/A
Duplicate ARIA ID Issues: No duplicate ARIA ID issues detected

Valid ARIA Attributes

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Use valid ARIA attributes to ensure assistive technologies work correctly on mobile. <strong><a class="text-danger" target="_BLANK" href="https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/4.10/aria-valid-attr">Learn More</a></strong>

Use valid ARIA attributes for mobile screen reader compatibility. Audit data is missing.

Valid ARIA Attributes: N/A
Raw Score: N/A
Valid ARIA Attribute Issues: No invalid ARIA attribute issues detected

Access Keys

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Use access keys appropriately for mobile navigation. Audit data is missing.

Access Keys: N/A
Raw Score: N/A
Access Key Issues: No access key issues detected

Form Field Multiple Labels

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Ensure form fields have a single, clear label on mobile. Audit data is missing.

Form Field Multiple Labels: N/A
Raw Score: N/A
Form Field Multiple Label Issues: No form field multiple label issues detected

Valid Language Attribute

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Use valid language codes for mobile accessibility. Audit data is missing.

Valid Language Attribute: N/A
Raw Score: N/A
Valid Language Attribute Issues: No invalid language attribute issues detected

ARIA Hidden Focus

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Avoid focusable elements within aria-hidden sections on mobile.

Avoid focusable elements within aria-hidden sections on mobile. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.

ARIA Hidden Focus: No ARIA hidden focus issues found
ARIA Hidden Focus Issues: No ARIA hidden focus issues detected

ARIA Treeitem Name

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Ensure ARIA treeitems have accessible names on mobile. Audit data is missing.

ARIA Treeitem Name: N/A
Raw Score: N/A
ARIA Treeitem Name Issues: No treeitem naming issues detected

ARIA Toggle Field Name

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Provide names for ARIA toggle fields on mobile.

Provide names for ARIA toggle fields on mobile. Audit data is missing.

ARIA Toggle Field Name: N/A
Toggle Field Naming Issues: No toggle field naming issues detected

ARIA Progressbar Name

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Ensure ARIA progressbars have accessible names on mobile.

Provide accessible names for ARIA progressbars on mobile. Audit data is missing.

ARIA Progressbar Name: N/A
Raw Score: N/A
Progressbar Naming Issues: No progressbar naming issues detected

ARIA Required Attribute

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Include required ARIA attributes for mobile elements.

Include required ARIA attributes for mobile elements. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.

ARIA Required Attribute: No missing required ARIA attribute issues found
Raw Score: 100%
Missing ARIA Attribute Issues: No missing required ARIA attribute issues detected

Interactive Element Affordance

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Ensure interactive elements indicate interactivity on mobile.

Ensure interactive elements indicate interactivity on mobile. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.

Interactive Element Affordance: No interactive element affordance issues found
Raw Score: 100%
Interactive Affordance Issues: No interactive element affordance issues detected

Custom Controls Labels

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Custom Controls Labels checks if custom interactive controls have associated labels for screen readers. Ensure custom controls have aria-label or aria-labelledby.

Provide labels for custom controls on mobile. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.

Custom Controls Labels: No custom control label issues found
Raw Score: 100%
Custom Control Label Issues: No custom control label issues detected

Custom Controls Roles

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Custom Controls Roles checks if custom interactive controls have appropriate ARIA roles for screen readers. Ensure custom controls have correct roles.

Use appropriate ARIA roles for custom controls on mobile. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.

Custom Controls Roles: No custom control role issues found
Raw Score: 100%
Custom Control Role Issues: No custom control role issues detected

Offscreen Content Hidden

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Offscreen Content Hidden checks if offscreen content is hidden from assistive technologies using display: none or aria-hidden="true". Ensure offscreen content is properly hidden.

Ensure offscreen content is hidden from mobile screen readers. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.

Offscreen Content Hidden: No offscreen content issues found
Raw Score: 100%
Offscreen Content Issues: No offscreen content issues detected

ARIA Command Name

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

ARIA Command Name checks if button, link, and menuitem elements have accessible names for screen readers. Ensure these elements have proper names.

Provide accessible names for ARIA commands on mobile. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.

ARIA Command Name: No command naming issues found
Raw Score: 100%
Command Naming Issues: No command naming issues detected

ARIA Required Children

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

ARIA Required Children checks if ARIA parent roles contain required child roles for screen readers. Ensure proper role nesting.

Ensure ARIA roles include required child elements on mobile. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.

ARIA Required Children: No required children issues found
Raw Score: 100%
Required Children Issues: No required children issues detected

Table Headers with Data Cells

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Ensure table headers are associated with data cells on mobile.

Ensure table headers are associated with data cells on mobile. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.

Table Header Data Cells: No table header data cell issues found
Raw Score: 100%
Table Header Data Cell Issues: No table header data cell issues detected

ARIA Input Field Name

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Provide accessible names for ARIA input fields on mobile.

Provide accessible names for ARIA input fields on mobile. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.

ARIA Input Field Name: No input field naming issues found
Raw Score: 100%
Input Field Naming Issues: No input field naming issues detected

Tab Index

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Use tab-index appropriately for mobile navigation.

Use tab-index appropriately for mobile navigation. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.

Tab Index: No tab index issues found
Raw Score: 100%
Tab Index Issues: No tab index issues detected

Definition List Item

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Ensure definition list items are structured properly on mobile.

Ensure definition list items are structured properly on mobile. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.

Definition List Item: No definition list item issues found
Raw Score: 100%
Definition List Item Issues: No definition list item issues detected

Bypass Blocks

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Provide a way to bypass repetitive content on mobile.

Provide a way to bypass repetitive content on mobile. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.

Bypass Blocks: No bypass blocks issues found
Raw Score: 100%
Bypass Blocks Issues: No bypass blocks issues detected

ARIA Roles

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Use valid ARIA roles to enhance mobile accessibility.

Use valid ARIA roles to enhance mobile accessibility. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.

ARIA Roles: No ARIA role issues found
Raw Score: 100%
ARIA Role Issues: No ARIA role issues detected

ARIA Meter Name

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Provide accessible names for ARIA meters on mobile.

Provide accessible names for ARIA meters on mobile. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.

ARIA Meter Name: No meter naming issues found
Raw Score: 100%
Meter Naming Issues: No meter naming issues detected

Visual Order Follows DOM

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Ensure visual order matches DOM order for mobile accessibility.

Ensure visual order matches DOM order for mobile accessibility. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.

Visual Order Follows DOM: No visual order issues found
Raw Score: 100%
Visual Order Issues: No visual order issues detected

Managed Focus

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Manage focus properly for mobile keyboard users.

Manage focus properly for mobile keyboard users. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.

Managed Focus: No focus management issues found
Raw Score: 100%
Focus Management Issues: No focus management issues detected

Input Image Alt Text

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Provide alt text for input images to ensure mobile accessibility.

Provide alt text for input images to ensure mobile accessibility. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.

Input Image Alt: No input image alt issues found
Raw Score: 100%
Image Input Issues: No image input alt text issues detected

Link Name

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Ensure links have descriptive names for mobile accessibility.

Ensure links have descriptive names for mobile accessibility. Score: 100%. Issues found: 0.

Link Name: No link naming issues found
Raw Score: 100%
Link Naming Issues: No link naming issues detected

JavaScript Libraries Detected

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Detects known JavaScript libraries via signature matching and supplements results with script payload/network context. Signature misses can occur with bundled or custom builds; smaller, intentional dependencies (especially third-party scripts) usually improve performance, maintainability, and security.

No external JavaScript libraries detected. This is excellent if your site works as intended without them.

Observed script payload: 0.0 KB across 0 script requests.

Detected JavaScript libraries: 0 found

Detected Count	Score Threshold	Interpretation	Status
0	100	No external libs (excellent if intentional)	Excellent
1 - 3	100	Lean dependency footprint	Excellent
4 - 5	85	Reasonable, review overlap	Warning
6 - 7	65	High dependency count	Warning
8+	40	Too many dependencies	Critical

Script Payload (KB)	Extra Score Adjustment	Reason
0 - 700 KB	0	Generally manageable payload
700 KB - 1.5 MB	-10	Heavier script footprint
1.5 MB - 2.5 MB	-20	Likely impactful on load/parse
> 2.5 MB	-30	High performance risk

Which libraries were found? None detected.

Is that good? Usually yes—if all required features work. Fewer dependencies generally means better performance, fewer security updates, and easier maintenance.

How to keep this score high: prefer vanilla JS/web APIs, remove dead scripts, and avoid adding libraries for one-off utilities.

External scripts carry added performance and security risk—keep third-party JS minimal. See “Vulnerable Libraries” for security follow-up.

Vulnerable Libraries Check

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Checks for front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities. Update or remove vulnerable libraries to protect your site from potential attacks.

No vulnerable JavaScript libraries detected. Your site does not include front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities.

Good news! Your site does not include any front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities.

Content Security Policy

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Content Security Policy (CSP) helps reduce the risk of cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. A strong CSP restricts sources of content and scripts that can run on your page.

Strong Content Security Policy detected. No CSP issues found.

Keyword Density Analysis

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Keyword density analysis shows word frequency on your page. Maintain natural content with 1-2% keyword density to avoid keyword stuffing penalties.

Keyword density analysis available. Review word frequency to ensure natural content without keyword stuffing.

Analysis of word frequency and density on your page. High keyword density may indicate keyword stuffing.

Single Keywords

Keyword	Occurrence	Density %	Possible Spam
	11	2.052 %	No
physical	6	1.119 %	No
Angelese	5	0.933 %	No
life	4	0.746 %	No
coaching	4	0.746 %	No
conversation	4	0.746 %	No
personal	4	0.746 %	No
Life	3	0.56 %	No
journey	3	0.56 %	No
space	3	0.56 %	No
page	2	0.373 %	No
Coaching	2	0.373 %	No
Wellness	2	0.373 %	No
Reviews	2	0.373 %	No
navigate	2	0.373 %	No
Dana	2	0.373 %	No
Point	2	0.373 %	No
CA	2	0.373 %	No
unique	2	0.373 %	No
approach	2	0.373 %	No

Two-Word Keywords

Keyword Phrase	Occurrence	Density %	Possible Spam
	5	0.933 %	No
808 9894095	4	0.746 %	No
Dana Point	2	0.373 %	No
Point CA	2	0.373 %	No
Her unique	2	0.373 %	No
unique approach	2	0.373 %	No
approach marrying	2	0.373 %	No
marrying life	2	0.373 %	No
life coaching	2	0.373 %	No
coaching with	2	0.373 %	No
created a	2	0.373 %	No
a transformative	2	0.373 %	No
transformative experience	2	0.373 %	No
experience along	2	0.373 %	No
along with	2	0.373 %	No
with her	2	0.373 %	No
her intuitive	2	0.373 %	No
intuitive understanding	2	0.373 %	No
understanding have	2	0.373 %	No
have been	2	0.373 %	No

Three-Word Keywords

Keyword Phrase	Occurrence	Density %	Possible Spam
	3	0.56 %	No
Dana Point CA	2	0.373 %	No
Her unique approach	2	0.373 %	No
unique approach marrying	2	0.373 %	No
approach marrying life	2	0.373 %	No
marrying life coaching	2	0.373 %	No
life coaching with	2	0.373 %	No
created a transformative	2	0.373 %	No
a transformative experience	2	0.373 %	No
transformative experience along	2	0.373 %	No
experience along with	2	0.373 %	No
along with her	2	0.373 %	No
with her intuitive	2	0.373 %	No
her intuitive understanding	2	0.373 %	No
intuitive understanding have	2	0.373 %	No
understanding have been	2	0.373 %	No
have been instrumental	2	0.373 %	No
been instrumental in	2	0.373 %	No
instrumental in my	2	0.373 %	No
in my journey	2	0.373 %	No

Four-Word Keywords

Keyword Phrase	Occurrence	Density %	Possible Spam
Her unique approach marrying	2	0.373 %	No
unique approach marrying life	2	0.373 %	No
approach marrying life coaching	2	0.373 %	No
marrying life coaching with	2	0.373 %	No
created a transformative experience	2	0.373 %	No
a transformative experience along	2	0.373 %	No
transformative experience along with	2	0.373 %	No
experience along with her	2	0.373 %	No
along with her intuitive	2	0.373 %	No
with her intuitive understanding	2	0.373 %	No
her intuitive understanding have	2	0.373 %	No
intuitive understanding have been	2	0.373 %	No
understanding have been instrumental	2	0.373 %	No
have been instrumental in	2	0.373 %	No
been instrumental in my	2	0.373 %	No
instrumental in my journey	2	0.373 %	No
in my journey toward	2	0.373 %	No
my journey toward holistic	2	0.373 %	No
journey toward holistic wellbeing	2	0.373 %	No
	2	0.373 %	No

Note: Optimal keyword density is typically 1-2%. Higher densities may be flagged as keyword stuffing by search engines.

Third-Party Code Impact

Excellent

Metric Score: 100%

Third-party code (ads, analytics, social widgets) can significantly impact page performance. Optimize loading strategies and consider lazy-loading non-critical scripts.

No third-party code detected.

No third-party code detected on your page.

Scoring Summary

Desktop Performance Metrics

Metric	Raw Score	Weight	Score	Overall Contribution
Desktop Performance - Total Blocking Time	100.00%	5 (3.82%)	3.82 / 3.82	61.07 / 9,437.07 (0.65%)
Desktop Performance - Largest Contentful Paint	31.00%	5 (3.82%)	1.18 / 3.82	18.93 / 9,437.07 (0.20%)
Desktop Performance - Cumulative Layout Shift	100.00%	5 (3.82%)	3.82 / 3.82	61.07 / 9,437.07 (0.65%)
Desktop Performance - First Contentful Paint	65.00%	3 (2.29%)	1.49 / 2.29	23.82 / 9,437.07 (0.25%)
Desktop Performance - Speed Index	76.00%	3 (2.29%)	1.74 / 2.29	27.85 / 9,437.07 (0.30%)
Desktop Performance - Minify CSS	100.00%	2 (1.53%)	1.53 / 1.53	24.43 / 9,437.07 (0.26%)
Desktop Performance - Minify JavaScript	100.00%	2 (1.53%)	1.53 / 1.53	24.43 / 9,437.07 (0.26%)
Desktop Performance - Remove Unused CSS Rules	100.00%	3 (2.29%)	2.29 / 2.29	36.64 / 9,437.07 (0.39%)
Desktop Performance - Remove Unused JavaScript	75.00%	3 (2.29%)	1.72 / 2.29	27.48 / 9,437.07 (0.29%)
Desktop Performance - Eliminate Render-Blocking Resources	0.00%	5 (3.82%)	0.00 / 3.82	0.00 / 9,437.07 (0.00%)
Desktop Performance - Avoid Chaining Critical Requests	100.00%	3 (2.29%)	2.29 / 2.29	36.64 / 9,437.07 (0.39%)
Desktop Performance - Network Round Trip Times	—	2 (1.53%)	—	No data
Desktop Performance - Initial Server Response Time	98.00%	4 (3.05%)	2.99 / 3.05	47.88 / 9,437.07 (0.51%)
Desktop Performance - Avoid Multiple Page Redirects	100.00%	3 (2.29%)	2.29 / 2.29	36.64 / 9,437.07 (0.39%)
Desktop Performance - Non-Composited Animations	100.00%	2 (1.53%)	1.53 / 1.53	24.43 / 9,437.07 (0.26%)
Desktop Performance - Time to Interactive	0.00%	3 (2.29%)	0.00 / 2.29	0.00 / 9,437.07 (0.00%)
Desktop Performance - Avoid Enormous Network Payloads	5.00%	2 (1.53%)	0.08 / 1.53	1.22 / 9,437.07 (0.01%)
Desktop Performance - DOM Size	100.00%	2 (1.53%)	1.53 / 1.53	24.43 / 9,437.07 (0.26%)
Desktop Performance - User Timings	100.00%	9 (6.87%)	6.87 / 6.87	109.92 / 9,437.07 (1.16%)
Desktop Performance - JavaScript Execution Time	79.00%	9 (6.87%)	5.43 / 6.87	86.84 / 9,437.07 (0.92%)
Desktop Performance - Minimize Main-Thread Work	90.00%	9 (6.87%)	6.18 / 6.87	98.93 / 9,437.07 (1.05%)
Desktop Performance - Ensure Text Visible During Webfont Load	0.00%	9 (6.87%)	0.00 / 6.87	0.00 / 9,437.07 (0.00%)
Desktop Performance - Resources Summary	42.00%	9 (6.87%)	2.89 / 6.87	46.17 / 9,437.07 (0.49%)
Desktop Performance - Use Efficient Cache Lifetimes	0.00%	3 (2.29%)	0.00 / 2.29	0.00 / 9,437.07 (0.00%)
Desktop Performance - Improve Image Delivery	—	3 (2.29%)	—	No data
Desktop Performance - Avoid Serving Legacy JavaScript to Modern Browsers	—	2 (1.53%)	—	No data
Desktop Performance - Avoid Forced Reflow	—	2 (1.53%)	—	No data
Desktop Performance - Network Dependency Tree	—	2 (1.53%)	—	No data
Desktop Performance - Images with Explicit Dimensions	100.00%	5 (3.82%)	3.82 / 3.82	61.07 / 9,437.07 (0.65%)
Desktop Performance - Optimized Images	100.00%	3 (2.29%)	2.29 / 2.29	36.64 / 9,437.07 (0.39%)
Desktop Performance - Text Compression	100.00%	3 (2.29%)	2.29 / 2.29	36.64 / 9,437.07 (0.39%)
Desktop Performance - Preconnect to Required Origins	100.00%	2 (1.53%)	1.53 / 1.53	24.43 / 9,437.07 (0.26%)
Desktop Performance - Efficient Animated Content	100.00%	2 (1.53%)	1.53 / 1.53	24.43 / 9,437.07 (0.26%)
Desktop Performance - Preload Key Requests	100.00%	2 (1.53%)	1.53 / 1.53	24.43 / 9,437.07 (0.26%)
Total Desktop Performance			64.15 / 91.60	1,026.44 / 9,437.07 (10.88%)

Mobile Performance Metrics

Metric	Raw Score	Weight	Score	Overall Contribution
Mobile Performance - First Contentful Paint	65.00%	3 (2.29%)	1.49 / 2.29	35.73 / 9,437.07 (0.38%)
Mobile Performance - Speed Index	76.00%	3 (2.29%)	1.74 / 2.29	41.77 / 9,437.07 (0.44%)
Mobile Performance - Total Blocking Time	100.00%	5 (3.82%)	3.82 / 3.82	91.60 / 9,437.07 (0.97%)
Mobile Performance - Largest Contentful Paint	31.00%	5 (3.82%)	1.18 / 3.82	28.40 / 9,437.07 (0.30%)
Mobile Performance - Cumulative Layout Shift	100.00%	5 (3.82%)	3.82 / 3.82	91.60 / 9,437.07 (0.97%)
Mobile Performance - Minify CSS	100.00%	2 (1.53%)	1.53 / 1.53	36.64 / 9,437.07 (0.39%)
Mobile Performance - Minify JavaScript	100.00%	2 (1.53%)	1.53 / 1.53	36.64 / 9,437.07 (0.39%)
Mobile Performance - Remove Unused CSS Rules	100.00%	3 (2.29%)	2.29 / 2.29	54.96 / 9,437.07 (0.58%)
Mobile Performance - Remove Unused JavaScript	75.00%	3 (2.29%)	1.72 / 2.29	41.22 / 9,437.07 (0.44%)
Mobile Performance - Eliminate Render-Blocking Resources	0.00%	5 (3.82%)	0.00 / 3.82	0.00 / 9,437.07 (0.00%)
Mobile Performance - Avoid Chaining Critical Requests	100.00%	3 (2.29%)	2.29 / 2.29	54.96 / 9,437.07 (0.58%)
Mobile Performance - Network Round Trip Times	—	2 (1.53%)	—	No data
Mobile Performance - Initial Server Response Time	98.00%	4 (3.05%)	2.99 / 3.05	71.82 / 9,437.07 (0.76%)
Mobile Performance - Avoid Multiple Page Redirects	100.00%	3 (2.29%)	2.29 / 2.29	54.96 / 9,437.07 (0.58%)
Mobile Performance - Non-Composited Animations	100.00%	2 (1.53%)	1.53 / 1.53	36.64 / 9,437.07 (0.39%)
Mobile Performance - Time to Interactive	0.00%	3 (2.29%)	0.00 / 2.29	0.00 / 9,437.07 (0.00%)
Mobile Performance - Avoid Enormous Network Payloads	5.00%	2 (1.53%)	0.08 / 1.53	1.83 / 9,437.07 (0.02%)
Mobile Performance - DOM Size	100.00%	2 (1.53%)	1.53 / 1.53	36.64 / 9,437.07 (0.39%)
Mobile Performance - User Timings	100.00%	9 (6.87%)	6.87 / 6.87	164.89 / 9,437.07 (1.75%)
Mobile Performance - JavaScript Execution Time	79.00%	9 (6.87%)	5.43 / 6.87	130.26 / 9,437.07 (1.38%)
Mobile Performance - Minimize Main-Thread Work	82.00%	9 (6.87%)	5.63 / 6.87	135.21 / 9,437.07 (1.43%)
Mobile Performance - Ensure Text Visible During Webfont Load	0.00%	9 (6.87%)	0.00 / 6.87	0.00 / 9,437.07 (0.00%)
Mobile Performance - Resources Summary	42.00%	9 (6.87%)	2.89 / 6.87	69.25 / 9,437.07 (0.73%)
Mobile Performance - Images with Explicit Dimensions	100.00%	5 (3.82%)	3.82 / 3.82	91.60 / 9,437.07 (0.97%)
Mobile Performance - Remove Duplicate JavaScript	100.00%	5 (3.82%)	3.82 / 3.82	91.60 / 9,437.07 (0.97%)
Mobile Performance - Avoid Long Tasks	80.00%	5 (3.82%)	3.05 / 3.82	73.28 / 9,437.07 (0.78%)
Mobile Performance - Use Efficient Cache Lifetimes	0.00%	3 (2.29%)	0.00 / 2.29	0.00 / 9,437.07 (0.00%)
Mobile Performance - Improve Image Delivery	—	3 (2.29%)	—	No data
Mobile Performance - Avoid Serving Legacy JavaScript to Modern Browsers	—	2 (1.53%)	—	No data
Mobile Performance - Avoid Forced Reflow	—	2 (1.53%)	—	No data
Mobile Performance - Network Dependency Tree	—	2 (1.53%)	—	No data
Mobile Performance - Optimized Images	100.00%	3 (2.29%)	2.29 / 2.29	54.96 / 9,437.07 (0.58%)
Mobile Performance - Text Compression	100.00%	3 (2.29%)	2.29 / 2.29	54.96 / 9,437.07 (0.58%)
Mobile Performance - Preconnect to Required Origins	100.00%	2 (1.53%)	1.53 / 1.53	36.64 / 9,437.07 (0.39%)
Mobile Performance - Efficient Animated Content	100.00%	2 (1.53%)	1.53 / 1.53	36.64 / 9,437.07 (0.39%)
Mobile Performance - Preload Key Requests	100.00%	2 (1.53%)	1.53 / 1.53	36.64 / 9,437.07 (0.39%)
Total Mobile Performance			70.47 / 99.24	1,691.36 / 9,437.07 (17.92%)

Mobile Accessibility Metrics

Metric	Raw Score	Weight	Score	Overall Contribution
Accessibility - Overall Score	100.00%	5 (4.31%)	4.31 / 4.31	86.21 / 9,437.07 (0.91%)
Accessibility - Logical Tab Order	100.00%	3 (2.59%)	2.59 / 2.59	51.72 / 9,437.07 (0.55%)
Accessibility - Avoid Meta Refresh	100.00%	2 (1.72%)	1.72 / 1.72	34.48 / 9,437.07 (0.37%)
Accessibility - Use Landmarks	100.00%	4 (3.45%)	3.45 / 3.45	68.97 / 9,437.07 (0.73%)
Accessibility - Avoid ARIA Hidden on Body	100.00%	2 (1.72%)	1.72 / 1.72	34.48 / 9,437.07 (0.37%)
Accessibility - Avoid Focus Traps	100.00%	3 (2.59%)	2.59 / 2.59	51.72 / 9,437.07 (0.55%)
Accessibility - ARIA Tooltip Name	100.00%	2 (1.72%)	1.72 / 1.72	34.48 / 9,437.07 (0.37%)
Accessibility - Valid HTML Language	100.00%	5 (4.31%)	4.31 / 4.31	86.21 / 9,437.07 (0.91%)
Accessibility - HTML Has Language	100.00%	5 (4.31%)	4.31 / 4.31	86.21 / 9,437.07 (0.91%)
Accessibility - ARIA Required Parent	100.00%	3 (2.59%)	2.59 / 2.59	51.72 / 9,437.07 (0.55%)
Accessibility - Focusable Controls	100.00%	3 (2.59%)	2.59 / 2.59	51.72 / 9,437.07 (0.55%)
Accessibility - Meta Viewport	100.00%	2 (1.72%)	1.72 / 1.72	34.48 / 9,437.07 (0.37%)
Accessibility - Avoid Duplicate ARIA IDs	100.00%	3 (2.59%)	2.59 / 2.59	51.72 / 9,437.07 (0.55%)
Accessibility - Valid ARIA Attributes	100.00%	3 (2.59%)	2.59 / 2.59	51.72 / 9,437.07 (0.55%)
Accessibility - Access Keys	100.00%	2 (1.72%)	1.72 / 1.72	34.48 / 9,437.07 (0.37%)
Accessibility - Avoid Multiple Form Labels	100.00%	3 (2.59%)	2.59 / 2.59	51.72 / 9,437.07 (0.55%)
Accessibility - Valid Language Codes	100.00%	5 (4.31%)	4.31 / 4.31	86.21 / 9,437.07 (0.91%)
Accessibility - ARIA Hidden Focus	100.00%	3 (2.59%)	2.59 / 2.59	51.72 / 9,437.07 (0.55%)
Accessibility - ARIA Treeitem Name	100.00%	2 (1.72%)	1.72 / 1.72	34.48 / 9,437.07 (0.37%)
Accessibility - ARIA Toggle Field Name	100.00%	2 (1.72%)	1.72 / 1.72	34.48 / 9,437.07 (0.37%)
Accessibility - ARIA Progressbar Name	100.00%	2 (1.72%)	1.72 / 1.72	34.48 / 9,437.07 (0.37%)
Accessibility - ARIA Required Attributes	100.00%	3 (2.59%)	2.59 / 2.59	51.72 / 9,437.07 (0.55%)
Accessibility - Interactive Element Affordance	100.00%	3 (2.59%)	2.59 / 2.59	51.72 / 9,437.07 (0.55%)
Accessibility - Custom Control Labels	100.00%	3 (2.59%)	2.59 / 2.59	51.72 / 9,437.07 (0.55%)
Accessibility - Custom Control Roles	100.00%	3 (2.59%)	2.59 / 2.59	51.72 / 9,437.07 (0.55%)
Accessibility - Offscreen Content Hidden	100.00%	2 (1.72%)	1.72 / 1.72	34.48 / 9,437.07 (0.37%)
Accessibility - ARIA Command Name	100.00%	2 (1.72%)	1.72 / 1.72	34.48 / 9,437.07 (0.37%)
Accessibility - ARIA Required Children	100.00%	3 (2.59%)	2.59 / 2.59	51.72 / 9,437.07 (0.55%)
Accessibility - Table Headers with Data Cells	100.00%	2 (1.72%)	1.72 / 1.72	34.48 / 9,437.07 (0.37%)
Accessibility - ARIA Input Field Name	100.00%	3 (2.59%)	2.59 / 2.59	51.72 / 9,437.07 (0.55%)
Accessibility - Tab Index	100.00%	3 (2.59%)	2.59 / 2.59	51.72 / 9,437.07 (0.55%)
Accessibility - Definition List Item	100.00%	2 (1.72%)	1.72 / 1.72	34.48 / 9,437.07 (0.37%)
Accessibility - Bypass Blocks	100.00%	3 (2.59%)	2.59 / 2.59	51.72 / 9,437.07 (0.55%)
Accessibility - ARIA Roles	100.00%	3 (2.59%)	2.59 / 2.59	51.72 / 9,437.07 (0.55%)
Accessibility - ARIA Meter Name	100.00%	2 (1.72%)	1.72 / 1.72	34.48 / 9,437.07 (0.37%)
Accessibility - Visual Order Follows DOM	100.00%	3 (2.59%)	2.59 / 2.59	51.72 / 9,437.07 (0.55%)
Accessibility - Managed Focus	100.00%	3 (2.59%)	2.59 / 2.59	51.72 / 9,437.07 (0.55%)
Accessibility - Input Image Alt Text	100.00%	5 (4.31%)	4.31 / 4.31	86.21 / 9,437.07 (0.91%)
Accessibility - Link Name	100.00%	4 (3.45%)	3.45 / 3.45	68.97 / 9,437.07 (0.73%)
Total Mobile Accessibility			100.00 / 100.00	2,000.00 / 9,437.07 (21.19%)

Mobile SEO Metrics

Metric	Raw Score	Weight	Score	Overall Contribution
Mobile SEO - Overall Score	—	8 (10.26%)	—	No data
Mobile SEO - Hreflang Tags	100.00%	6 (7.69%)	7.69 / 7.69	76.92 / 9,437.07 (0.82%)
Mobile SEO - Descriptive Link Text	100.00%	6 (7.69%)	7.69 / 7.69	76.92 / 9,437.07 (0.82%)
Mobile SEO - Canonical Links	—	7 (8.97%)	—	No data
Mobile SEO - Is Crawlable	100.00%	8 (10.26%)	10.26 / 10.26	102.56 / 9,437.07 (1.09%)
Mobile SEO - Crawlable Anchors	100.00%	6 (7.69%)	7.69 / 7.69	76.92 / 9,437.07 (0.82%)
Mobile SEO - HTTP Status Code	100.00%	7 (8.97%)	8.97 / 8.97	89.74 / 9,437.07 (0.95%)
Mobile SEO - Image Alt Text	100.00%	6 (7.69%)	7.69 / 7.69	76.92 / 9,437.07 (0.82%)
Mobile SEO - Structured Data	100.00%	4 (5.13%)	5.13 / 5.13	Not weighted
Mobile SEO - Robots.txt	100.00%	7 (8.97%)	8.97 / 8.97	89.74 / 9,437.07 (0.95%)
Mobile SEO - Document Title	—	7 (8.97%)	—	No data
Mobile SEO - Meta Description	—	6 (7.69%)	—	No data
Total Mobile Seo			58.97 / 58.97	589.74 / 9,437.07 (6.25%)

Mobile Best Practices Metrics

Metric	Raw Score	Weight	Score	Overall Contribution
Mobile Best Practices - Overall Score	100.00%	8 (9.09%)	9.09 / 9.09	90.91 / 9,437.07 (0.96%)
Mobile Best Practices - External Anchors Use rel=noopener	100.00%	6 (6.82%)	6.82 / 6.82	68.18 / 9,437.07 (0.72%)
Mobile Best Practices - CSP for XSS Protection	100.00%	7 (7.95%)	7.95 / 7.95	79.55 / 9,437.07 (0.84%)
Mobile Best Practices - HTML Doctype	100.00%	6 (6.82%)	6.82 / 6.82	68.18 / 9,437.07 (0.72%)
Mobile Best Practices - Detected JavaScript Libraries	100.00%	4 (4.55%)	4.55 / 4.55	45.45 / 9,437.07 (0.48%)
Mobile Best Practices - Avoid AppCache Manifest	100.00%	5 (5.68%)	5.68 / 5.68	56.82 / 9,437.07 (0.60%)
Mobile Best Practices - Uses HTTPS	100.00%	8 (9.09%)	9.09 / 9.09	90.91 / 9,437.07 (0.96%)
Mobile Best Practices - No Vulnerable Libraries	100.00%	7 (7.95%)	7.95 / 7.95	79.55 / 9,437.07 (0.84%)
Mobile Best Practices - Avoid Geolocation on Start	100.00%	6 (6.82%)	6.82 / 6.82	68.18 / 9,437.07 (0.72%)
Mobile Best Practices - Responsive Image Sizes	100.00%	6 (6.82%)	6.82 / 6.82	68.18 / 9,437.07 (0.72%)
Mobile Best Practices - Image Aspect Ratio	100.00%	6 (6.82%)	6.82 / 6.82	68.18 / 9,437.07 (0.72%)
Mobile Best Practices - No Unload Listeners	100.00%	5 (5.68%)	5.68 / 5.68	56.82 / 9,437.07 (0.60%)
Mobile Best Practices - No Inspector Issues	100.00%	7 (7.95%)	7.95 / 7.95	79.55 / 9,437.07 (0.84%)
Mobile Best Practices - Avoid Deprecated APIs	100.00%	7 (7.95%)	7.95 / 7.95	79.55 / 9,437.07 (0.84%)
Total Mobile Best Practices			100.00 / 100.00	1,000.00 / 9,437.07 (10.60%)

Non-Lighthouse Metrics

Metric	Raw Score	Weight	Score	Overall Contribution
Core - Page Title	50.00%	8 (6.35%)	3.17 / 6.35	63.49 / 9,437.07 (0.67%)
Core - Meta Description	50.00%	7 (5.56%)	2.78 / 5.56	55.56 / 9,437.07 (0.59%)
Core - Meta Keywords	0.00%	3 (2.38%)	0.00 / 2.38	0.00 / 9,437.07 (0.00%)
Core - Keywords - One Word	86.50%	4 (3.17%)	2.75 / 3.17	54.92 / 9,437.07 (0.58%)
Core - Keywords - Two Words	85.00%	5 (3.97%)	3.37 / 3.97	67.46 / 9,437.07 (0.71%)
Core - Keywords - Three Words	85.00%	5 (3.97%)	3.37 / 3.97	67.46 / 9,437.07 (0.71%)
Core - Keywords - Four Words	85.00%	4 (3.17%)	2.70 / 3.17	53.97 / 9,437.07 (0.57%)
Core - Keyword Usage	0.00%	6 (4.76%)	0.00 / 4.76	0.00 / 9,437.07 (0.00%)
Core - Text To Html Ratio	6.10%	5 (3.97%)	0.24 / 3.97	4.84 / 9,437.07 (0.05%)
Core - HTML Headings	20.00%	6 (4.76%)	0.95 / 4.76	19.05 / 9,437.07 (0.20%)
Core - Sitemap	100.00%	5 (3.97%)	3.97 / 3.97	79.37 / 9,437.07 (0.84%)
Core - Internal vs External Links	75.00%	5 (3.97%)	2.98 / 3.97	59.52 / 9,437.07 (0.63%)
Core - NoIndex, NoFollow, DoFollow Links	100.00%	4 (3.17%)	3.17 / 3.17	63.49 / 9,437.07 (0.67%)
Core - SEO Friendly Links	50.00%	5 (3.97%)	1.98 / 3.97	39.68 / 9,437.07 (0.42%)
Core - Favicon	100.00%	3 (2.38%)	2.38 / 2.38	47.62 / 9,437.07 (0.50%)
Core - Image Alt Test	50.00%	6 (4.76%)	2.38 / 4.76	47.62 / 9,437.07 (0.50%)
Core - DOC Type	100.00%	4 (3.17%)	3.17 / 3.17	63.49 / 9,437.07 (0.67%)
Core - Deprecated HTML Tag	100.00%	5 (3.97%)	3.97 / 3.97	79.37 / 9,437.07 (0.84%)
Core - HTML Page Size	25.00%	5 (3.97%)	0.99 / 3.97	19.84 / 9,437.07 (0.21%)
Core - GZIP Compression	100.00%	6 (4.76%)	4.76 / 4.76	95.24 / 9,437.07 (1.01%)
Core - Inline CSS	25.00%	4 (3.17%)	0.79 / 3.17	15.87 / 9,437.07 (0.17%)
Core - Internal CSS	25.00%	4 (3.17%)	0.79 / 3.17	15.87 / 9,437.07 (0.17%)
Core - Micro Data Schema Test	25.00%	5 (3.97%)	0.99 / 3.97	19.84 / 9,437.07 (0.21%)
Core - IP Canonicalization Test	0.00%	4 (3.17%)	0.00 / 3.17	0.00 / 9,437.07 (0.00%)
Core - URL Canonicalization Test	100.00%	5 (3.97%)	3.97 / 3.97	79.37 / 9,437.07 (0.84%)
Core - Plain Text Email Test	0.00%	3 (2.38%)	0.00 / 2.38	0.00 / 9,437.07 (0.00%)
Total Non-Lighthouse Metrics			55.65 / 100.00	1,112.94 / 9,437.07 (11.79%)

Overall Categories Summary

Category	Score (%)	Awarded Points	Weight	Weighted Contribution
Desktop Performance	70.03%	64.15 / 91.60	16%	1,026.44 / 9,437.07 (10.88%)
Mobile Accessibility	100.00%	100.00 / 100.00	20%	2,000.00 / 9,437.07 (21.19%)
Mobile Best Practices	100.00%	100.00 / 100.00	10%	1,000.00 / 9,437.07 (10.60%)
Mobile Performance	71.02%	70.47 / 99.24	24%	1,691.36 / 9,437.07 (17.92%)
Mobile Seo	100.00%	58.97 / 58.97	10%	589.74 / 9,437.07 (6.25%)
Non-Lighthouse Metrics	55.65%	55.65 / 100.00	20%	1,112.94 / 9,437.07 (11.79%)

Overall Total Points Awarded: 7,420.48

Overall Total Points Available: 9,437.07

Overall Percentage: 78.63%

What Does "Liquid Purple" mean?

noun | / LIK-wid PUR-pul /

(biochemistry) Also known as visual purple or rhodopsin — a light-sensitive receptor protein found in the rods of the retina. It enables vision in dim light by transforming invisible darkness into visible form. Derived from the Greek rhódon (rose) and ópsis (sight), its name reflects its delicate pink hue and vital role in perception.
(modern usage) Liquid Purple — a digital marketing agency specializing in uncovering unseen opportunities and illuminating brands hidden in the digital dark. Much like its biological namesake, Liquid Purple transforms faint signals into clear visibility — revealing what others overlook and bringing businesses into the light.

Origin: From the scientific term rhodopsin, discovered by Franz Christian Boll in 1876; adopted metaphorically by a marketing firm dedicated to visual clarity in the age of algorithms.

Rooted in Southern California, Serving the World.
For over 20 years, Liquid Purple has been headquartered in the heart of Southern California, serving clients across Irvine, Newport Beach, Anaheim, and the greater Los Angeles area. While we are proud of our local roots, our digital reach extends far beyond our local area. We support businesses in major hubs like Denver, Dallas, New York, and Miami, as well as international clients. Our ability to operate across time zones means you can often wake up to completed tasks and progress updates—keeping your business moving while you sleep.